Značka: pump and dump

Serum price soars 140% in one week amid FTX 'exit pump' fears

Serum, a “decentralized exchange” on the Solana blockchain, has performed exceptionally well in terms of its SRM token price, despite it ties to the defunct FTX exchange.SRM price up 140% in one weekOn the daily chart, the SRM/USD pair has gained 140% in the last seven days, hitting $0.319 on Nov. 21 versus $0.177 on Nov. 14. This pushed the circulating market cap to about $73 million and “fully diluted market cap,” the market cap if the maximum supply was in circulation, to nearly $2.8 billion.SRM/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView”Closer to zero”SRM price rallied despite the ongoing delisting of Serum trading pairs across major cryptocurrency exchanges, including Binance, OKEx, Gate.io, and Phemex, thus raising fears about an ongoing “exit pump.”Exit pumps are when large investors pump the token’s price in a low-liquidity environment to attract new buyers, only to then dump their entire holdings on amateur investors as witnessed with numerous pump-and-dump schemes.Hahah. This pump here, is meant to trap anybody in a position on kucoin $SRM because it’s getting delisted TOMORROW. Maybe now. pic.twitter.com/fVVYumSkNA— IcZ 64 ♣️Geиo Analysis ♠️ (@IcZeno) November 15, 2022Distrust in Serum has grown due to its troubling exposure to FTX. In a Nov. 11 bankruptcy filing, a leaked balance sheet revealed that FTX had $8 billion in liabilities against a reserve mostly comprised of illiquid assets, including SRM.Notably, FTX showed about $5.4 billion worth of SRM tokens in its reserves, or almost 97% of Serum’s total market cap, including the circulating and fully-diluted supply.As a result, the token’s exposure to FTX has raised the possibility of a major selloff. “If FTX had attempted to sell them into the market over the course of a week or month or year, it would have swamped the market and crashed the price,” noted Matt Levine, Bloomberg’s Opinion Columnist, adding: “Perhaps it could have gotten a few hundred million dollars for them. But I think a realistic valuation of that huge stash of Serum would be closer to zero. That is not a comment on Serum; it’s a comment on the size of the stash.”Serum community forks to cut ties with FTXThe SRM price rally in the past seven days coincided with efforts to distance Serum from FTX.Serum’s key backers threw their weight behind an emergency “community fork” after wallets associated with FTX saw suspicious outflows worth $266.3 million on Nov. 11. Brain Long, one of the popular validators on Solana, noted that the fork had renewed the market’s sentiment in SRM.Open Source + Order Book = Open Book. The name also suggests transparency.Post other ideas below. Also, post some #BadNamesOnly for humor. ;-)— Brian Long | Block Logic | Triton One ☀️ (@brianlong) November 15, 2022

Still, Serum’s fork has failed to attract fresh capital toward its liquidity pools. As of Nov. 21, the total-value-locked inside Serum’s reserves was a mere 33,900 SOL compared to 3.3 million SOL at the start of the month.Serum total-value-locked as of Nov. 21. Source: Defi LlamaSerum price collapse ahead?From a technical perspective, SRM stares at the possibility of undergoing massive selloffs in the coming weeks.The bearish argument stems from a descending triangle setup on its daily chart, which suggests more declines ahead if coupled with the previous SRM price downtrend. Descending Triangle patterns are trend continuation setups. Related: Not just FTX Token: Solana price nukes 40% along with other ‘Sam coins’Hence, SRM now eyes a potential breakdown below the triangle’s lower trendline near $0.234. A successful break below the said support would risk sending the price toward the level at length equal to the maximum distance between the triangle’s upper and lower trendline.In other words, SRM price risks crashing to $0.10, or by 65%, by December 2022. Conversely, a breakout above the triangle’s upper trendline near $0.30 could have the token test its 50-day exponential moving average (50-day EMA; the red wave) at $0.56 as its next key upside target.This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Čítaj viac

Alameda on the radar of BitDAO community for alleged dump of BIT tokens

The recent concerns related to the volatility of FTX Token (FTT) seeped into FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried’s other business operation, Alameda Research, as the BitDAO community requested information about Alameda’s BitDao (BIT) holding commitment.On Nov. 2, 2021, BitDAO swapped 100 million BIT tokens with Alameda in exchange for 3,362,315 FTT tokens with a public commitment to hold each other’s tokens for three years, so until Nov. 2, 2024. Given the rising uncertainties and speculations, the BitDAO community was quick to react to the sudden fall of BIT prices on Nov. 8, 2022, suspecting Alameda of dumping the BIT tokens and breaching the three-year mutual no-sale public commitment.BIT market price chart (1 day). Source: CoinMarketCapTo narrow down the reasons for BIT’s price drop, the BitDAO community requested an allowance for monitoring and verifying Alameda’s commitment to holding BIT tokens. BitDAO provided proof of honoring its side of the commitment by sharing an address that shows BitDAO Treasury holding all 3,362,315 FTT tokens.In return, the community gave Alameda a deadline of 24 hours to prove its commitment, requesting that:“The preferred method is for Alameda to transfer the 100 million $BIT tokens to an on-chain (non-exchange) address for the BitDAO community to verify, and hold until the end of the agreement.”Ben Zhou, the co-founder of crypto exchange Bybit, summed up the matter by stating that while nothing is confirmed, the BitDAO community wants to confirm proof of funds from Alameda.Standing up against the accusation, Caroline Ellison, the CEO at Alameda Research, confirmed no wrongdoing from the company’s end and promised to share the proof of funds, telling Zhou that:“Busy at the moment but that wasn’t us, will get you proof of funds when things calm down.”BitDAO’s proposal to request for Alameda’s funds proof was accompanied by vague warning:“If this request is not fulfilled, and if sufficient alternative proof or response is not provided, it will be up to the BitDAO community to decide (vote, or any other emergency action) how to deal with the $FTT in the BitDAO Treasury.”Alex Svanevik, the CEO of blockchain analytics platform Nansen, investigated the on-chain data to find that Mirana Ventures — Bybit’s venture capital arm — withdrew 100 million BIT from FTX. However, he advised the crypto community not to fall for speculations, as withdrawing funds doesn’t mean Alameda is selling.Related: Coinbase, Alameda-backed Mara launches African crypto wallet serviceFrom Nov. 6, numerous FTX users faced problems while withdrawing their funds from the exchanges, such as delays and failures.FTX addressed the concerns raised by investors by highlighting the smooth operation of the matching engine. However, the exchange agreed on delays with Bitcoin (BTC) withdrawals due to limited node throughput. In addition, users facing delays in stablecoin withdrawals were told that withdrawal speeds would get back to normal after banks resumed operations during the weekdays.

Čítaj viac

‘I've done nothing wrong’ — Lark Davis denies ‘pump-and-dump’ allegations

Crypto influencer Lark Davis has refuted new allegations from Twitter “on-chain sleuth” ZachXBT of shilling “low cap projects” to his audience “just to dump them shortly after.”Davis was responding to a Twitter thread posted by Zach on Sept. 29, containing allegations that he profited over $1.2 million through selling tokens from crypto projects which he was allegedly paid to promote without disclosing.In a 17-part thread, Zach pointed to eight examples of what is supposedly Davis’ crypto wallet receiving tokens from new crypto projects, with Davis subsequently tweeting or posting a video on them, and then selling the tokens shortly after.Speaking to Cointelegraph, Zach said he received requests from multiple people who lost money on the tokens shared by Davis asking to “take a closer look” at him.“Lark managed to dump with size on low cap projects time after time,” Zach said, adding they’ve investigated other crypto influencers, but the alleged amount was “never at this magnitude.”Zach alleged in the thread that the largest gain to Davis came from receiving 120,000 SHOPX tokens, with Davis tweeting hours later about the project whilst apparently simultaneously selling the tokens, gaining $435,000.6/ Example 3: $SHOPXa) Mar 31, 2021 at 3:31 pm UTC Lark receives 120k SHOPXb) Apr 1, 2021 at 12:32 am UTC Lark Tweets about the projectc) Meanwhile Lark is in the process of dumping all his 120k SHOPX for over $435k USD (finishes on 4/2) pic.twitter.com/mc3HvHrCdI— ZachXBT (@zachxbt) September 29, 2022This example along with seven others Zach presented purportedly shows Davis making over $1.2 million in a similar pattern.“Participating in seed rounds & sharing projects you genuinely like is completely fine as long as it’s done in a transparent manner,” Zach tweeted, adding:“This is not the case as Lark has a pattern of dumping his discounted launchpad bags right after shills across YT (YouTube), Twitter, & [his] newsletter.”Cointelegraph requested comment from Davis and was directed to a series of tweets posted late on Sept. 29 in which Davis calls the allegations made by Zach “ridiculous” and provided a response to each example Zach alleged he profited from.Related: ‘Far too easy’ — Crypto researcher’s fake Ponzi raises $100K in hours“I got nothing for free,” Davis tweeted to his over one million followers, adding his token sale investments are “always disclosed” on his YouTube channel of 485,000 subscribers and shared with his followers “well before the launch.”For the sales in question, I want to be clear that: 1. I disclosed that I was an investor when I initially discussed them2. I talked about it before the token sale, to give you a chance to get into the sale. 3. I paid for all of these coins, I got nothing for free.— Lark Davis (@TheCryptoLark) September 29, 2022

Davis added he was following an investing strategy he teaches, selling the tokens upon launch, which he claims is a common investing practice for token sales. Davis said the amounts he sold were “nowhere near enough to dump the price” of the tokens.“I teach this concept frequently to you all, none of this should be a surprise if you have been paying attention,” he tweeted. “What you choose to do with my opinions is completely up to you.”

Čítaj viac

How to identify and avoid a crypto pump-and-dump scheme?

Educating oneself about the crypto ecosystem is crucial for investors to pursue during a bear market while awaiting a bull cycle. That being said, having a good understanding of crypto investment entails keeping an eye out for fraudulent projects that threaten to drain assets overnight, a.k.a. pump-and-dump schemes.Pump-and-dump in crypto is an orchestrated fraud that involves misleading investors into purchasing artificially inflated tokens — typically marketed and hyped by paying celebrities and social influencers. SafeMoon token is one of the most prominent examples of an alleged pump-and-dump scheme involving A-list celebrities, including Nick Carter, Soulja Boy, Lil Yachty and YouTubers Jake Paul and Ben Phillips.Once the investors have purchased tokens at inflated prices, the people owning the biggest pile of tokens sell out, resulting in an immediate crash in the token’s prices. While fraudsters disguise pump-and-dump schemes under the pretext of creating the next batch of crypto millionaires, knowledgable investors have the upper hand in identifying and avoiding their involvement. Pump-and-dump schemes are usually accompanied by false promises around three broad categories — solving real-world use cases, guaranteed exorbitant returns and unwithered backing from celebrities and influencers.The long-term success of a cryptocurrency is heavily dependent on the use cases it serves. As a result, people supporting pump-and-dump projects often suffice their involvement by highlighting the use cases the token aims to serve. In addition, such schemes typically rope in celebrities by upfront payments in cash and the project’s in-house tokens. Celebrities then market the fraudulent tokens to trusting fans, usually with promises of high investment returns. In the case of SafeMoon, celebrities were accused of a slow rug pull, implying a slow sell-off of holdings as the trading volume from retail investors remained inflated. Binance, the biggest crypto exchange in terms of trading volume, also warned investors from taking investment advice from celebrities and influencers.Superstars ≠ crypto experts.Music artist @JBALVIN says “do your own research”.On 2.13 when big names try to give you crypto advice — sound #CryptoCelebAlert and grab 1/2222 NFTs of basketball star @JimmyButler!Learn more ⬇️https://t.co/3rC7r0uJ8M pic.twitter.com/Hml8AN2aEs— Binance (@binance) February 7, 2022In the next bull cycle, traditional and crypto investors across the globe will amp up efforts to recoup losses from the ongoing bear market. Knowing this information, fraudsters will try and find opportunities to dupe unwary investors by presenting unrealistic gains. As a result, do your own research (DYOR) stands as one of the best pieces of advice in crypto.Related: Sygnia CEO criticizes Elon Musk for alleged Bitcoin pump and dumpElon Musk was recently accused of manipulating crypto prices by prominent South African billionaire businesswoman Magda Wierzycka. Wierzycka believes that Musk’s social media activity and its implications on the price of Bitcoin (BTC) should have made him the subject of an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. She believes that Musk knowingly pumped up the price of Bitcoin via tweets, including those mentioning Tesla’s $1.5 billion BTC purchase, then “sold a big part of his exposure at the peak.”

Čítaj viac

Voyager token skyrockets as VGX pump scheme touted

The native token for the embattled crypto brokerage Voyager Digital has skyrocketed in what seems to be a new effort to inflate its price seemingly inspired by the recent “CEL short squeeze.” On July 13, Voyager’s VGX token surged 178% to hit an intraday high of $0.891 before falling back to around $0.559, according to CoinGecko. It had regained ground back u to $0.717 at the time of publication. The price rise has coincided with the appearance of a Twitter hashtag called #PumpVGXJuly18, as well as the formation of a Telegram group called the “Voyager Community Recovery Channel,” which had more than 2,100 members at the time of writing.The token has gained more than 400% since the beginning of the week as speculators appear to be jumping aboard the latest quick buck bandwagon.This week’s VGX pump is a reversal of a steady downtrend for the crypto token this year, losing almost 80% since the beginning of 2022. It is also down 94.3% since its January 2018 all-time high of $12.47.On July 6, Voyager Digital announced its restructuring plan, which would include issuing Voyager tokens to customers that had suffered losses following its suspension of trading earlier in the month. The same day, the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in New York, citing liquidity issues arising from Three Arrows Capital’s (3AC) outstanding debts.The latest twist in the saga came when a federal judge in New York froze the remaining assets of 3AC on July 12. Another part of the restructuring plan includes any recovery of assets from 3AC, which could also partly explain the increase in the perceived value of the VGX tokens. Unknown crypto venture firm MetaFormLabs, which initiated the move on Twitter to pump VGX on July 9, has pledged to rescue Voyager through this means. On July 13, the firm detailed its token price target, and the amounts pledged for the rescue package. “We have set a new target range of 5USD-8USD. Currently, we have 50,000,000USD internally and 67,000,000USD pledged by well-known crypto enthusiasts.”By July 14, it claimed to have $135 million in funds for the rescue package, which will be announced in full on July 18, coinciding with its token pump peak plans. 1 thing is clear.Don’t say we didn’t give you any pre warnings of our intentions.#PumpVGXJuly18 July 18 2022 @ 2PM PST We will stop sharing exact amounts we have pledged.Current total ready for July 18: 135,000,00USD+Whoever shorts will probably get swallowed whole.NFA— MetaFormLabs | #PumpVGXJuly18 (@MetaFormLabs) July 13, 2022Following the initial pump, which began on July 13 as prices lifted off from $0.15, MetaFormLabs asserted that this was nothing to do with them. “Where there’s green there’s vultures that prey for low entries. #PumpVGXJuly18 will go ahead as planned on July 18 @ 2pm PST. Today’s movement wasn’t us, we’ve not even begun yet.”The pump scheme has been met with a healthy dose of skepticism from the crypto community on Twitter.Regarding #VGX and the “Pump $VGX” going around…Know what you are getting into. A lot of supply is locked up on Voyager which can skew pricing. $VGX optimism can potentially help Voyager make customers whole, but know the risk you are taking.— shingolavine.eth (@shingolavine) July 13, 2022

There was no mention of any bailout plans on Voyager’s official Twitter feed. Related: Investors lament potentially lost ‘millions’ on Voyager bankruptcyCointelegraph reached out to MetaFormLabs for further details in response to their call to do so but had not heard back by the time this article was published.Meanwhile, VGX was already dumping and had lost 21% from its initial pump yesterday. A similar pump and dump occurred with the newly launched Terra LUNA tokens, which surged above $10 a couple of days after they went live in late May, only to dump to around $2 a week later.

Čítaj viac

Crypto influencers allegedly weaponize conspiracies to fleece QAnon followers

Two QAnon-affiliated conspiracy theorist influencers allegedly caused their followers millions of dollars in losses by running a cryptocurrency pump-and-dump scheme.The pair reportedly persuaded their thousands of followers to invest in a portfolio of cryptos, presenting a misleading mix of conspiratorial and genuine content along with claims about institutions backing the tokens to generate hype and raise the price of the portfolio.The allegations are included in an investigation by Logically, a group of data scientists and developers. It reported the two influencers running the Telegram channels “WhipLash347” and the “Quantum Stellar Initiative” (QSI) coordinated to promote lists of Stellar (XLM) altcoins which have been marked as fraudulent by the Stellar network.WhipLash347 is a Telegram group with 277,000 followers and QSI has 35,000. They reportedly told their followers the cryptocurrencies would succeed based on their insider knowledge, claiming they had access to secret military intelligence.The publication said the two mixed conspiratorial content and misinformation to target those distrusting of mainstream financial and media institutions to give authenticity to the cryptocurrencies they promoted. The losses are believed to be in the millions, and Logically claimed one man committed suicide after losing $100,000 in the scheme.A user known as PatriotQakes, leads the QSI main channel, which has multiple regional affiliates. The ownership of the WhipLash347 account is believed to have changed hands more recently due to changed behavior.Rocky Morningside, a former admin of the QSI group told Logically he believes that “without doubt that WhipLash347, PatriotQakes, and QSI are scam artists,” who were promoting “pump and dumps.”Cointelegraph requested a response to the allegations from PatriotQakes, an account seemingly belonging to the person behind Whiplash347 and an admin of a regional QSI group regarding the allegations but did not receive a reply by the time of publication. Neither of the groups have publicly acknowledged or responded to the allegations.A former investor in one of the schemes using the name “Cutter” now runs a Twitter account aimed at exposing WhipLash347. He told Cointelegraph that he is a member of a Telegram group with 3000 other disgruntled investors and said of the person behind WhipLash347: “He’s created a huge list of crypto’s with now dead domains, as well as bogus white papers claiming to be affiliated with real companies. We’ve talked to so many of the coins’ real creators that he mimics through copycat assets who have to continually tell people WhipLash is full of shit.”Cutter says WhipLash creates trust with his followers through sharing similar political views, perpetuating the scheme by claiming “upcoming events” will cause the value of the assets to skyrocket.According to Cutter, WhipLash responded to the claims by saying all information is under non-disclosure agreements and anybody affiliated with the assets isn’t allowed to talk until the “event”.“There’s always a timeline, but when the dates pass and nothing happens, he creates new timelines. It’s never ending.”He also apparently claimed to be in communication with figures like Elon Musk, and said the crypto-friendly billionaire backs the cryptocurrencies WhipLash is promoting.Cutter said that anyone raising questions is kicked out of the group.“Anyone who questions his narrative is removed from his Telegram group, and he continues to rinse and repeat among his followers. As people exit, new people join. It needs to stop.”Related: Social media blamed for $1B in crypto scam losses in 2021

Čítaj viac
Načítava

Získaj BONUS 8 € v Bitcoinoch

nakup bitcoin z karty

Registrácia Binance

Burza Binance

Aktuálne kurzy