Autor Cointelegraph By Zhiyuan Sun

Silvergate Capital's crypto-to-fiat transfers decrease by $50B compared to Q3 2021

On Oct. 18, Silvergate Capital, a crypto-fiat gateway network designed for financial institutions, announced its financial results for Q3 2022.The bank, known for services such as processing consumer fiat deposits to cryptocurrency exchanges, saw thetransfer volume on the Silvergate Exchange Network plummet close to $50 billion compared to Q3 2021. Silvergate handled $112.6 billion of such transfers in Q3 2022. It appears that investors were less than satisfied with the results. Silvergate’s share price, as listed on the U.S. NASDAQ exchange, fell by close to 22% at the time of publication after the results were announced.In addition, Alan Lane, Silvergate’s president and CEO, said in an earnings call with investors that the company would likely “miss its goal” of launching a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar this year, citing ongoing regulatory compliance work. Earlier this year, Silvergate acquired Facebook’s (now Meta) former stablecoin project Diem. The company plans to integrate the Diem stablecoin into its own SEN technology. Interestingly, the company’s profits actually surged 84% year-over-year to $43.328 million. This is because the bank relies on interest earned from its digital asset customers’ deposits, which stood at $13.2 billion in Q3. Over the past 12 months, the U.S. Federal Reserve has increased the benchmark Fed Funds Rate from 0.00% to 0.25% last September to 2.25% to 2.50% in Septembe 2022. Correspondingly, the average interest earned on Silvergate’s custodied assets increased from 1.27% in Q3 2021 to 2.58% in Q3 2022.With regard to the results, CEO Alan Lane stated:”While volumes on the Silvergate Exchange Network (SEN) decreased this quarter compared to the overall industry, we remain confident in the power of our platform and the opportunities for expansion within the network. We continued to see demand for our SEN Leverage product and growth in our new customer pipeline.”

Čítaj viac

Users upset that Binance's wrong crypto network retrieval fees have soared to 500 BUSD

On Oct. 18, the product team at cryptocurrency exchange Binance held an ask-me-anything session with users on Reddit. Of particular interest was a discussion that arose regarding retrieval fees for crypto sent on different networks than the recipient’s wallet address on Binance. According to user Maxx3141, who brought up the issue:”I accidentally send WETH [wrapped Ether] to my Polygon address two months ago. Your exchange supports Polygon, but just for MATIC. It was only like 100$ in value. I found out you previously could recover this for a 30$ fee, and I thought that was fine. But when I contacted you, I found out you just raised the fee to 500 BUSD.”Another user, Superb_Dragonfruit63, also raised the issue of having to pay 500 BUSD for crypto retrievals on unmatched transactions, to which the Binance staff responded:”Token retrieval requires tech and operating effort, which is why we charge a certain fee for processing. It would cost similar effort and time regardless of the value. Thank you for the feedback; we will continue to review our fee structure as we progress.”Unlike noncustodial wallets, wallets on centralized exchanges require matching the deposit network addresses of the sender and the recipient. Thus, accidents such as sending unlisted tokens or coins on different networks that are otherwise compatible (i.e., sending Bep-20 BNB to an ERC-20 ETH address) result in the funds failing to appear on the exchange’s user interface. Instead, exchange staff must manually access their wallet address to recover the funds.A few months prior, Binance charged 0.001 BTC (around $40 at the time) to recover users’ funds that had been sent erroneously. However, not everyone felt sympathy for the users voicing their displeasure at the fee increase. One individual, gamma55, wrote a while back in a post on the same issue: “Given that Binance needs to pass the issue to someone with privileges to do manual transfers from hot wallets, the fee is pretty normal, really. The normal hourly price for a person of that rank [with access priviledge] is easily hundreds of dollars, so they just bill you what they would for bigger clients. Don’t send coins and tokens on the wrong networks, and it won’t cost you a cent extra. Fifty bucks was too cheap and was probably abused to gain support for unsupported shit.”

Čítaj viac

Terra developers propose revised 95M LUNA ecosystem funding program

On Monday, developers of the Terra ecosystem, which consists of Luna Classic (LUNC) — formerly known as Terra (LUN, TerraUSD (USTC), and Luna 2.0 (LUNA), proposed a revised expansion program for allocating 95 million LUNA ($248 million). As told by Terra, the new proposal is designed to incentivize development in the Terra ecosystem and fix issues in the original proposal.In the original plan, around 10% of LUNA’s total supply, or 100 million LUNA, would be allocated to the ecosystem, with 80% of this amount going to developer mining rewards. However, Terra staff explains that there are only a handful of projects with total value locked on the protocol, and such lack of competition would not result in the proper distribution of mining revenue.Under the new proposal, developer mining rewards would decrease from approximately 80 million LUNA to 20 million LUNA. On the other hand, 50 million LUNA would be reallocated as liquidity mining rewards to incentivize building decentralized exchanges on the Terra ecosystem. Another 20 million LUNA would be given as developer grants, with a maximum recipient amount of 125,000 LUNA per project per year. Finally, 5 million LUNA will be given to users to incentivize traction.1/ Attention #LUNAtics, a new proposal has just been posted on Agora outlining a new ecosystem expansion program – The Terra Expedition https://t.co/wW92766GXj— Terra Powered by LUNA (@terra_money) October 17, 2022A seven-member committee consisting of TerraForm Labs (TFL) employees, community leaders and external experts will oversee the allocation of funds. The appointment period will be one year, with non-TFL employees in the group receiving a monthly compensation of 1,000 LUNA. Although the committee members will vote to decide on funding proposals, the committee, itself, will have discretionary authority over the allocation of funds.Meanwhile, the treasury will be managed by a separate group consisting of two validators, two community members and three members of TFL. A few months earlier, the Terra Luna ecosystem suffered a devastating $40 billion collapse, with the algorithmic LUNC-USTC coin pair spiraling out of control as part of a week of intense sell-offs. Since then, the ecosystem has partially stabilized but remains well below of pre-crash market valuation. According to DefiLlama, TVL on Luna currently stands at $51 million. 

Čítaj viac

New allegations arise regarding Binance's regulatory framework

On Oct. 17, a new report published by Reuters alleged that cryptocurrency exchange Binance “swerved scrutiny” from regulators in the United Kingdom and the United States. The main spearhead of the allegations arises from two supposed incidents in its operating history.First, Reuters wrote of Binance strategy executive Zoe Wei’s proposal to backdate a service agreement relating to various operations between Binance’s U.K. unit and Binance’s Cayman Islands holding company on March 11, 2020. The move allegedly allowed Binance to exempt itself from registration with the country’s Financial Conduct Authority for one year, as any firm operating before January 10, 2020, could do so before new regulations came into place.Second, Reuters reported that Harry Zhou, a Binance-affiliated entrepreneur, presented a proposal in November 2018 that would allegedly direct enforcement attention to a U.S. entity instead of Binance, itself. Reuters alleged that the proposal arose because “despite the ban on U.S. users [due to financial crime laws], Binance was aware that traders there continued to use the main platform.”Hours later, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), Binance’s CEO, posted a rebuttal to the Reuters report. In the article, CZ specifically addressed the allegations surrounding its U.S. entity:”This is the tale of the so-called “Tai-Chi [defensive action] PowerPoint,” which was submitted by an external consultant as a suggestion on how to set up a business in the US. Let me state clearly once again for the record: it was never implemented. I personally rejected it.With regard to its regulatory framework, CZ explained that Binance’s market cap has “multiplied exponentially” over a short period of time and that “there isn’t a manual that explains how to immediately pivot from a small start-up to a Fortune 100 organization.” He added, “But we’re learning fast,” pointing to Binance being the first major exchange outside of the U.S. to KYC users. Though, the crypto executive did not provide comments regarding Reuter’s allegations of its conduct in the U.K.

Čítaj viac

‘Terra hit us incredibly hard’: Sunny Aggarwal of Osmosis Labs

Sunny Aggarwal has vivid memories of some of the worst days of his life earlier this year. The blockchain co-founder and his Osmosis protocol were hit hard by the Terra–LUNA collapse and are still recovering from its fallout today.

“The Terra crash hit us incredibly hard because we were one of the biggest DEXs for providing liquidity to TerraUSD and Luna Classic,” he explains, “At one point, it made up over 50% of our liquidity.” 

“I always tell people that the Terra Luna protocol was created by someone with either an IQ of 50 or 150. And frankly, I can’t tell which one.”

Aggarwal is a co-founder and leads the development of the $225-million Osmosis DEX, which, at one point, eclipsed $2 billion in TVL before the coming of the crypto winter.

The rise of cross-chain bridges 

Osmosis is a decentralized exchange (DEX) operating on Cosmos, the creator of the interblockchain communications protocol (IBC).

At the time of the last bear market, the development of interchain technologies, allowing users, data and tokens to port between chains, was close to being on the edge of the unknown. 

Laser-focused on price movements of tokens, few traders were across terminology, such as IBC, Tendermint or Cosmos. But fast forward five years, there are now nearly 50 blockchains using IBC to conduct more than 10 million IBC transactions daily across the ecosystem. And it still has more than $1 billion in total value locked across the protocol despite the market sell-off. 

Apart from his work in blockchain, Aggarwal is known for his eccentric selection of hats.

Osmosis aside, Sunny Aggarwal is also known for his splendid hat collection. Source: Sunny Aggarwal

The meme that started a crypto career

“A good friend of mine walked up to me and said, ‘Did you know that Dogecoin just sponsored the Jamaican bobsled team?’” he recalls. “And I was like, ‘What the hell is Dogecoin? What does it even mean?’”

Aggarwal first became aware of crypto’s existence during his senior year at Bridgewater-Raritan High School in New Jersey. At the time, crypto was a relatively new phenomenon and there were no extracurriculars or school clubs about the subject. Instead, the idea of blockchain spread the old-fashioned way. 

“That sentence didn’t make any sense to me,” Aggarwal tells Magazine. “But I’m always fascinated by what I don’t know, so I went home that night and looked up Dogecoin for the first time.”

Like many others, Aggarwal found the idea of Dogecoin interesting and quite funny but did not really expect the coin to evolve into a billion-dollar-market-cap asset with celebrities fussing over it as it has. 

Instead, Dogecoin became a gateway token for Aggarwal to explore the vast realm of digital currencies. And so, during his freshman year majoring in computer science and political economy at the University of California, Berkeley, Aggarwal joined a small blockchain club and began teaching the subject to a class of roughly 80 students in his first semester. 

Blockchain at UC Berkeley has since grown into a burgeoning community. Source: Blockchain at Berkeley

“For me, the best way to learn something is to teach it. At Berkeley, there’s this cool concept where students can teach courses as long as it’s backed by professors. And so, my computer science professor Dawn Song gave us the green light.” 

A lateral path toward the interchain 

From the pool of students who attended his “lectures,” Aggarwal invited them to a new club he founded called “Blockchain at Berkley,” which is still ongoing and has since evolved into an award-winning blockchain consulting and development team. After learning the required knowledge, Aggarwal interned at Consensus, the creator of the popular MetaMask wallet, after his sophomore year in the summer of 2017. 

“All of us in the club were pretty much Bitcoin maximalists at the time, but we felt like something was missing in the ecosystem,” he says. “At that time, Ethereum was gaining a lot of traction, and I wanted to learn more about it.”

Contrary to expectations, Aggarwal did not find Ethereum to his liking. “It just didn’t click for me, and there was no roadmap as to how the network could have worked out in the long term.” But the experience turned his attention toward a novel mechanism called proof-of-stake consensus. 

And so, Aggarwal went out and read all the proof-of-stake white papers he could lay his hands on. “Out of all of them, it was the Tendermint piece that I liked the most,” says Aggarwal, citing the protocol’s simplicity. “Devs could build this in, like, a couple of months if we all wanted to.” 

That summer, Aggarwal reached out to the Tendermint team, which is the core developers of the Cosmos and IBC ecosystem, and asked if any positions were available. At the time, the would-be Osmosis co-founder didn’t even know that Tendermint was behind Cosmos. But after hearing about its projects in development, such as IBC and cross-chain bridges, Aggarwal felt that the ecosystem was a perfect fit. 

Sunny Aggarwal at Cosmoverse, with his iconic headdress. Source: Cosmoverse

“Everything just clicked. The idea of Cosmos solved all the issues I saw with the Ethereum model. So, I dropped out of UC Berkeley that September and began working on Cosmos full-time. I’ve been doing it for the last five years.” 

According to Aggarwal, what really fascinated him about IBC was its scalability on both the technical and social levels. “Just take a look at Ethereum,” he says. “It has gotten so big to the point where there’s tens of thousands of DApps building on it. And that, in my view, means that technical advancement on the blockchain grinds to a halt.” 

Subscribe
The most engaging reads in blockchain. Delivered once a
week.

Aggarwal explains that it’s simply unfeasible to consider all Ethereum projects’ needs, given the sheer numbers. “Things would be much simpler if instead of you had fully vertically integrated app chains that could iterate the protocol layer very rapidly like IBC.” In addition, the history of Ethereum hard forks further solidified his belief in IBC.

“Each application and community should have sovereignty over their own system. We can’t fork a blockchain every time there is a disagreement. If one application wants to fork, that shouldn’t cause my application to fork as well.”

Osmosis developers at WeWork. Source: Sunny Aggarwal, Twitter

Users of the Osmosis DEX can make use of 89 cross-chain bridges across 45 blockchains on Osmosis. That means one can swap in and out of connected tokens in a noncustodial manner, as well as earn swap fees for providing liquidity. 

Like most co-founders, on an average day in Osmosis, Aggarwal spends most of his time taking calls and coordinating the team’s internal focus. About 25% of his time is devoted to coding and the remainder is spent networking with stakeholders in the ecosystem and with those looking to join.

But the event made Aggarwal and his team think long and hard about the protocol’s vulnerabilities. “Experiencing two tokens making up over half of our liquidity crashing to zero in a matter of days made us implement stricter safety controls.” On Osmosis, bridge rate limiting is now in place where, for illustrative purposes, a pool containing $100 million of digital assets can only have $5 million or so moved across an IBC bridge every six hours.

IBC protocols such as the Osmosis DEX connects digital assets across blockchains. Source: Map of Zones

Reflections and the road beyond

Moving forward, Aggarwal sees himself working for Osmosis in the next five years or so. “What Osmosis means will change over time; will it always just be a DEX, or transition into some other element? I can’t say for sure.” But it’s Aggarwal’s firm belief that most crypto projects will be built on Cosmos “in the next decade.” “Hence,” he says, “I can definitely see myself working on this stuff for the long term.”

As to his ultimate vision for DeFi, Aggarwal says it all boils down to one catchphrase he’s polished over the years: 

“It’s all about enabling privacy for the individual and transparency for the system.” 

He points to the example of Robinhood and the firm’s practice of selling customers’ order flow to big hedge funds to make a profit: “That’s why we want to build a privacy-enabled DEX where none of that stuff happens. But at the same time, we want the system to be accountable. We want users to see, for example, how much overall leverage the protocol has. And not some clouded manifestation like in CeFi. That’s the vision I want to give.” 

Zhiyuan Sun
Zhiyuan Sun is a technology writer at Cointelegraph. Initially starting out with mechanical engineering in college, he quickly developed a passion for cryptocurrencies and finance. He has several years of experience writing for major financial media outlets such as The Motley Fool, Nasdaq.com and Seeking Alpha. When away from his pen, one can find him in his scuba gear in deep waters.

Follow the author @Bio_Chameleon

Čítaj viac

Získaj BONUS 8 € v Bitcoinoch

nakup bitcoin z karty

Registrácia Binance

Burza Binance

Aktuálne kurzy