Autor Cointelegraph By David Attlee

Twitter chases Citadel’s founder, Binance in a race of subpoenas

As the failed acquisition of social platform Twitter by one of the world’s richest men, Elon Musk, turned into a protracted court conflict, both sides are filing subpoenas to gather information ahead of the first hearing. Recent reports claim that Twitter has made an effort to serve subpoenas to Ken Griffin, the founder of hedge fund Citadel, and to major crypto exchange Binance. According to Bloomberg on Aug. 1, the delivery was attempted at both the Citadel office at Lexington Ave., New York, and at Griffin’s Manhattan residence. The company reportedly refused to accept the legal papers on Griffin’s behalf, alleging that the only option was to deliver the subpoena to the Chicago office. As Yahoo Finance reports, on the same day Twitter directed a subpoena to Binance among a dozen of Musk’s advisers and potential lenders in the deal. The subpoenas demand the receivers hand over communication evidence that might support or refute Musk’s suggestion that the social network has under-reported the number of fake or “spam” accounts present on the platform.Related: Twitter lawyers up to force through Musk deal. Will it work?Justifying his decision to exit the deal, Musk accused Twitter of concealing the actual number of fake/bot accounts, which in his estimate exceeds 5% of monetizable daily active users (mDAUs) — the mark claimed by social network’s management. Twitter agrees that this number might be incorrect, but insists that it acknowledged possible errors before the negotiations were terminated by Musk. The company believes Musk’s grievance to be an artificial pretext for backing out of the deal. The first hearing on Twitter’s suit will be held on Oct.17. The company intends to force Musk into completing the acquisition judicially. In its quarterly report, Musk-led Tesla revealed the sellout of 75% of its Bitcoin holdings in Q2 2022. The revenue, taken in fiat money, composed $936 million. At the same time, Musk himself hasn’t sold any of his personal Bitcoin stash, while Tesla still has an estimated 10,800 BTC on its books.

Čítaj viac

What Kazakhstan’s new tax regime means for the crypto mining industry

On July 11, the President of Kazakhstan, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, signed new tax rates for crypto mining operators into law. While these amendments reflect the country’s growing frustration with the undertaxed and non-transparent usage of the national power grid by both foreign investors and domestic perpetrators, the new taxes could hardly be called excluding. Moreover, they could signal the further adoption and legalization of mining in energy-rich Kazakhstan, making the country and the region an even more attractive destination for miners amid tightening pressure in more established jurisdictions. Reality checkThe two amendments will come into effect on Jan. 1, 2023, and will tie tax rates to the price mining operators pay for the electricity. Following a progressive scale, an operator will have to pay $0.024, or 10 tenges, of taxes for a kilowatt-hour (kWh) of energy at the lowest price of $0.012–0.024, and $0.0072, or 3 tenges, at the highest of $0.048–0.060 per Kwh. Those who use renewable energy that they produce will face the most favorable conditions of only one tenge per kWh. These recent amendments are not the Kazakh government’s first attempt to tax the industry. A previous bill was signed by Tokaev on June 29, 2021, and introduced an additional payment of $0.0023, or 1 tenge, at the time for 1 kWh of electricity consumed for mining. The tax amendments became a landmark in the long and difficult history of Kazakhstan’s relationship with the crypto mining frenzy, which drew a wave of foreign mining operators to the country. By some estimates, more than 87,849 mining machines have been brought to the republic by November 2021. Kazakhstan’s star on the global mining map sparked swiftly after the nationwide crackdown on crypto mining in China. By 2021, the country became second in global Bitcoin (BTC) mining — trailing only behind the United States — and accounted for 18.1% of the global Bitcoin mining hash rate. Chinese miners have been relocating their business to Kazakhstan, believing it to be “a paradise of the mining industry” because of the stable political environment and cheap electricity. The Kazakh government, for its part, has welcomed the wave of new investors by supporting crypto mining up to the point of direct subsidies — experts have been anticipating more than $1.5 billion of tax revenue from mining within the next five years. Digital mining was recognized as a legitimate business activity earlier in 2020 when the law “On Amendments and Additions to Some Legislative Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the regulation of digital technologies” laid the foundations for crypto regulation.However, the fairytale met reality in early 2022 when it turned out that both x-factors for mining — political stability and energy abundance — were far from guaranteed. By the end of 2021, it became clear that the country’s energy system didn’t have the capacity to accommodate all miners, and in January 2022, the nationwide protests over fuel prices led to a brief political collapse, with Russian troops stepping in to defend the status quo. Coincidentally, after the winter political tumult, Kazakh authorities reconsidered their stance toward crypto mining and began attempts to take the wildly growing industry under control. On Feb. 8, Tokayev ordered a cabinet-level investigation of cryptocurrency mining, with Kazakh First Vice Minister of Finance Marat Sultangaziyev proposing power price hikes for crypto miners. Since then, the government began to periodically report the shutdowns of illicit miners, with the largest case taking place in March when 55 illegal mining farms “voluntarily stopped their operation” due to an enforcement campaign by regulators, with another 51 entities’ operations “terminated.”Recent: How blockchain technology can revolutionize international tradeIn May, the country’s Minister of Digital Development laid out new reporting requirements for miners and passed the now-signed tax guidelines in the first reading to domesticate the industry and avoid further problems with power shortages. The authorities even publicly acknowledged the influence of the winter raids on its revenue, which composed a modest $1.5 million in Q1 2022 — a number that hardly matches the ambitious forecasts mentioned above. Caveats and benefitsSpeaking to Cointelegraph, founder and CEO of crypto mining firm Sazmining William Szamosszegi took an unapologetically oppositional stance toward Kazakh authorities’ efforts to regulate the mining industry. Although environmental issues caused by energy consumption are certainly a concern, he believes that the regulations may not be the most effective solution because they do not boost innovation and instead raise the cost of living for everyday people. Translating into higher food and energy prices for the population “on the ground,” such policies could complicate things even more:“Protests erupted in Kazakhstan after gas prices doubled at the very beginning of 2022. This price hike is no accident: The government has increasingly intervened in the country’s energy sector over the last several years, often to support renewable projects. But, there is no such thing as a free lunch, so their support for renewables comes at the cost of coal, crude oil and natural gas producer.”Szamosszegi noted another official policy not directly tied to crypto regulation, the “Energy Conservation and Energy Efficiency” law passed in January 2022. This legislation forced a number of criteria on both energy consumers and producers, for example, an obligation to register with the State Energy Registry for all the entities that consume energy resources amounting to 1,500 or more tons of standard fuel per year. In his opinion, that slows down the growth of the energy sector, which in turn leaves the sector vulnerable to price increases. Aleksandr Podobnykh, a blockchain cybersecurity and fraud expert and member of the regional Association of Chief Information Security Officers (ACISO), is of a different mind. He told Cointelegraph that, although the new taxes could hardly be welcomed by miners, they will help Kazakhstan to maintain the sustainability of its energy sector: “This of course aggravates the work of miners. But good for the state. The lines and equipment will be updated — we need to use more cheap and renewable energy.”While endorsing the new tax amendments, Podobnykh highlighted a weak spot, which occurred already in previous legislation efforts and didn’t go away with the latest update. In particular, the new amendments have not changed the existing legislation regarding the tax obligations of individuals who have received property income from the sale of digital unsecured assets. Hence, taxable income will be calculated as the entire sale price of such an asset without deducting the cost of acquisition.There is also controversy regarding the rental of mining services. Under current tax guidelines, crypto mining rentals will be taxed as income from renting property. Under these guidelines, the widespread practice of selling hash rate, where the customer rents a certain amount of computing power from a crypto miner, remains without a specific regulatory regime. As Podobnykh explained: Recent: The rise of fake cryptocurrency apps and how to avoid them“It will concern large miners to a greater extent. Cloud miners will also be indirectly affected because this will affect the cost of services proportionally. Of course, not for those who rent facilities in other jurisdictions.”Still, even with the aforementioned caveats, the overall combination of taxes and energy prices in Kazakhstan remains relatively attractive — even at the highest mark, 1 kWh would cost miners around $0.067, which is significantly lower than the average of $0.12 per kWh before any taxes in the United States The post-Soviet republic remains perhaps the clearest jurisdiction for miners in the region, and the new tax regime will serve as an acid test for Kazakhstan’s neighbors, Podobnykh believes: “This is definitely a positive signal for the industry as a whole in Kazakhstan. To some extent, it acts as a pilot zone for the countries of the former CIS and Russia.” 

Čítaj viac

Singaporean financial watchdog to consult public on stablecoin regulation

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), a city-state’s principal financial regulator, assesses the merits of a regulatory regime toward stablecoins. Current guidelines focus on Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) issues and do not reflect the specific risks to which the stablecoins are entitled. On Monday, the MAS official portal published a written response by the regulator’s head, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, to a question posed by one of Singapore’s members of parliament. The question inquired if there is data on the extent of Singaporeans’ exposure to the recent collapse in the value of the TerraUSD Classic (USTC) stablecoin and the Luna Classic (LUNC) token, and whether the MAS is actively considering measures to tackle similar crises. Shanmugaratnam acknowledged that the Terra collapse illustrates the high risks of the crypto investment but insisted that the turmoil hasn’t affected the mainstream financial system and the economy significantly. In the majority of his answer, the official revealed MAS’ current plans for stablecoins. He claimed that MAS is actively reviewing its approach to the regulation of stablecoins, as the existing framework, in which stablecoins, alongside other cryptocurrencies, are being considered digital payment tokens (DPTs), doesn’t cover the specific risks. Hence, MAS “is assessing the merits of a regulatory regime” tailored to the specific characteristics of stablecoins. It shall focus on such aspects as regulating the reserve requirements and the stability of the peg. As the response specifies, MAS intends to consult the public on the possible guidelines in the upcoming months. Related: Singapore’s financial watchdog considers further restrictions on cryptoOn July 19, Ravi Menon, the managing director of MAS, publicly disavowed the associations between TerraForm Labs, Three Arrows Capital (a crypto hedge fund ongoing bankruptcy proceedings) and crypto regulation in Singapore. In his speech, Menon also emphasized the necessity to shift the regulatory focus from the KYC/AML toward the more nuanced risks posed by crypto.

Čítaj viac

Coinbase, Binance and Kraken under scrutiny: Law Decoded, July 25-August 1

Despite some good signs of the crypto prices recovery, last week could hardly be called bright for the market, as the major news came from the enforcers and not the regulators. According to a report from the New York Times, the United States Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has been investigating crypto exchange Kraken for allegedly allowing users based in Iran and other countries to buy and sell crypto in a potential violation of U.S. sanctions. In the other hemisphere, the Philippines’ think tank Infrawatch PH filed a twelve-page complaint calling on the local Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to crack down on Binance’s activities in the country. The news comes shortly after the Philippines’ Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) waved off a Binance ban proposal in early July, citing a lack of regulatory clarity, as one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges indeed still doesn’t hold a license in the Philippines. These developments form an alarming trend, given the ongoing investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission into Coinbase’s alleged trading of unregistered securities. Michael Bacina, an Australian digital assets lawyer with Piper Alderman, told Cointelegraph that the impact on exchanges might occur whether or not the tokens are ultimately found to be securities. And, it would be serious and chilling for both those exchanges and the token projects. Cathie Wood sells Coinbase shares amid insider trading allegationsOne of the largest stockholders of the Coinbase cryptocurrency exchange has dumped a massive amount of shares due to a reported probe by the SEC. Cathie Wood’s investment firm Ark Investment Management has sold a total of more than 1.4 million Coinbase shares, or 0.6% of the exchange-traded fund’s (ETF) total assets. Based on the selling day’s closing price, the value of the sold shares amounted to slightly more than $75 million.Continue readingNo stablecoin bill in the U.S. until SeptemberLawmakers in the United States House of Representatives have reportedly pushed back the timeline for considering a bill addressing the potential risks of stablecoins. According to a report from the Wall Street Journal, people familiar with the matter said House members will likely delay voting on a stablecoin bill until September after being unable to complete a draft in time for a committee meeting. The unresolved issues in the bill reportedly included provisions on custodial wallets from the Treasury Department and concerns from the SEC.Continue reading IMF suggests dark clouds ahead for cryptoThe IMF’s July update on the World Economic Outlook titled “Gloomy and More Uncertain” points to “higher-than-expected inflation” and a contraction of global output as indicators of incoming poor economic growth. And, unfortunately for the crypto industry, in that sense, it is still heavily tied to the global financial market — the report cites the crypto bear market as one of the global macro factors. Continue reading

Čítaj viac

FCA cracks down on the ads of high-risk assets, but not crypto

The British Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) demands clearer and more prominent risk warnings from the companies marketing high-risk investments. Certain investment incentives, such as refer a friend bonus, will be banned altogether. In a note published on Aug. 1, the FCA has finalized stronger rules to “help tackle misleading adverts that encourage investing in high-risk products.” The regulator’s attempt to reduce the number of people investing in high-risk products follows a concern that “a significant number of people” don’t understand the risks engraved into some kind of investment. Cryptoasset promotions, however, are exempted from the new guidelines. The FCA intends to come up with final rules on crypto promotion only after the government confirms that such assets are in the regulator’s remit.Nevertheless, as the release qualifies crypto as a high-risk asset as well, the future rules will likely match the ones it has drawn in the announcement. According to the FCA: “Crypto remains high risk, so people need to be prepared to lose all their money if they choose to invest in crypto assets.”Following the statement, last year, the FCA intervened in significantly more financial promotions to prevent harm than earlier. In the year ending in July 2022, it has amended or withdrawn 4,226 adverts. Related: UK financial watchdog exec hints at the importance of international collaboration on crypto regulationThe FCA is inviting feedback on the new rules to be provided by Oct. 10, 2022, and promises to confirm its final draft early next year. On July 20, he Financial Services and Markets Bill was introduced into the United Kingdom’s Parliament. It will regulate stablecoins and extend the Banking Act of 2009 and Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act of 2013 to cover “digital settlement assets” (DSAs), authorizing the Treasury to regulate DSAs.

Čítaj viac

Získaj BONUS 8 € v Bitcoinoch

nakup bitcoin z karty

Registrácia Binance

Burza Binance

Aktuálne kurzy