BlackRock’s misguided effort to create ‘Crypto for Dummies’
Crypto doesn’t need BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF. It undermines the basic tenets of cryptocurrency — from banking the unbanked to reducing global oppression.
Čítaj viacUverejnil používateľ Cointelegraph By Daniele Servadei | aug 8, 2023 |
Crypto doesn’t need BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF. It undermines the basic tenets of cryptocurrency — from banking the unbanked to reducing global oppression.
Čítaj viacUverejnil používateľ Cointelegraph By Daniele Servadei | júl 2, 2023 |
Those of us in Italy and surrounding countries will be allowed to continue trading Zcash, Monero and other coins that Binance sought to condemn as unworthy.
Čítaj viacUverejnil používateľ Cointelegraph By Daniele Servadei | mar 16, 2023 |
The fire lit by Silvergate Bank and Silicon Valley Bank will make it harder for crypto to find financial partners.
Čítaj viacUverejnil používateľ Cointelegraph By Daniele Servadei | nov 18, 2022 |
“Never in my career have I seen such a complete failure of corporate controls and such a complete absence of trustworthy financial information,” new FTX CEO John Ray III said in a legal filing on Thursday. “From compromised systems integrity and faulty regulatory oversight abroad, to the concentration of control in the hands of a very small group of inexperienced, unsophisticated and potentially compromised individuals, this situation is unprecedented.”Ray, who oversaw Enron’s bankruptcy in 2001, stepped in as CEO shortly after founder Sam Bankman-Fried resigned (and reportedly tried to flee to Argentina, although he denies it). He is absolutely right that FTX was brought down by a complete failure of corporate controls, but in reality, the situation is far from unprecedented. And unless the whole industry gets a grip, it will keep happening. That’s why the exchange’s collapse might actually turn out to benefit crypto in the long term: although right now it seems it’s only contributing to tarnishing its reputation, the FTX saga playing out before our sorry eyes is a chance to turn things around before it’s too late — which is to say, before greed, negligence and corporate malpractice bring the entire industry to its knees.Related: Will SBF face consequences for mismanaging FTX? Don’t count on itEssentially, cases like FTX’s are a time bomb waiting to explode, and the longer they are left unchecked, the bigger the damage they can cause becomes. This is evident purely by looking at the scope of the deception at play and relating it to the company’s valuation, which, just in February, stood at $32 billion, or more than the Nasdaq, Credit Suisse and Robinhood. Of that, Bankman-Fried’s personal fortune stood at $16 billion. In his own words, “sometimes life creeps up on you.” Well, sometimes, so do the consequences of your own actions. Now, the United States Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission are investigating the collapse. California’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) is also opening an investigation, and so are authorities in the Bahamas. Legal experts suggest FTX’s use of customer money could constitute fraud or embezzlement. Oh, and a class-action lawsuit alleges that “FTX’s fraudulent scheme was designed to take advantage of unsophisticated investors” who “collectively sustained over $11 billion dollars in damages.”This proves the importance of looking into a company’s background and finances — crypto or not — before allowing it to become bigger than Nasdaq, not after. Due diligence can help differentiate sound investments from terrible ideas between good crypto projects and bad crypto projects. And no, “he was on the cover of Fortune Magazine, he was a big name” is not due diligence. It’s falling for the oldest trick in the book.Just spoke with an LP in several crypto funds: he said when he asked funds why they did “lazy” DD on FTX, they responded basically “he was on the cover of Fortune Magazine. He was a big name.” There’s going to be a lot of lawsuits. And a lot of funds will shutter.— Frank Chaparro (@fintechfrank) November 13, 2022Because Bankman-Fried might have graced the cover of Fortune (then again, so did Elizabeth Holmes), but he proved his worth as an incompetent, incapable leader. He was nothing but a fraud. In a recent tell-all with a Vox reporter on Twitter, he admitted that “the ethics stuff” — read: his beloved philosophy based on philanthropic efforts and effective altruism — was mostly a front, as “it’s what reputations are made of.”“I feel bad for those who get f–ked by it,” he added, a statement that’s hard to believe. So, what comes next? Preventing this from happening again. Knowing what we know now, it’s paramount that the industry as a whole get in “reputation management” mode and conduct a review of any remaining bad apples, for they cannot be allowed to cause the kind of damage that FTX did. Crypto just wouldn’t survive it. Related: Binance’s victory over FTX means more users moving away from central exchangesBy giving innovative, science-backed and reliable projects more space and airtime and cutting off any emboldened fraudsters before they have the chance to make any more victims, the industry can allow new names to flourish and help bring the project back to its original mission. By ensuring that the names replacing FTX in the public’s collective understanding of what crypto is and stands for are absolutely foolproof, the industry can reinstate a golden standard of behavior and return to what it was intended to be. The crypto ecosystem is at a crossroads: It can either innovate, regulate, review and begin again, or it will fail. The FTX saga is a sign that it’s time to make a choice. It’s true FTX’s downfall was a shock to many: enthusiasts, investors, legislators and casual crypto-curious individuals alike. But, to put it plainly, it could be the best thing to happen to crypto. Only time will tell, and the world is watching.Daniele Servadei is the co-founder and CEO of Sellix, an e-commerce platform based in Italy.This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
Čítaj viacUverejnil používateľ Cointelegraph By Daniele Servadei | nov 1, 2022 |
Giant companies like Apple have made a fortune by centralizing their powers and profits and expanding their product and services network to be a part of people’s lives in as many ways as they can. Until recently, however, Apple had also demonstrated an ability to tunnel-focus its efforts to stay relevant and up to date with what consumers wanted, what mattered to them and what they needed most from the tech giants they rely on. It seems that this is not strictly true anymore, and that is a real shame. In its updated App Store guidelines unveiled on Oct. 24, Apple announced that crypto exchange applications “may facilitate transactions or transmissions of cryptocurrency on an approved exchange” only “in countries or regions where the app has appropriate licensing and permissions to provide a cryptocurrency exchange.” Additionally, any further payments needed to unlock extra features will need to be made with “in-app purchase currencies,” as developer apps “may not use their own mechanisms to unlock content or functionality, such as license keys, augmented reality markers, QR codes, cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency wallets.”This is aimed at ensuring “a safe experience for users” and a chance for developers “to be successful,” Apple claims, but I disagree. It’s clear to see that this is just another clever trick Apple is using to keep all the profits it can make; a particularly interesting move, as it pertains to nonfungible token (NFT) technology and Web3 games, which are soaring in popularity.Related: Nodes are going to dethrone tech giants — from Apple to GoogleIn a classic Apple move, the tech giant is attempting to control the “walled garden” it has spent decades building around its technology to prevent being challenged “over what software can land on its iPhones and Macs and what that software can do.”But, cracks in the iron fence may be beginning to show. Apple has been blocking various features in crypto apps for some time as well. https://t.co/4WGLAgS48i— Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) October 28, 2022In May, the European Commission “charged Apple with abusing its payment dominance” in regard to Apple Pay practices, as it remains the only contactless option available for mobile payments on iPhone and iPad devices. And, as a 30% usage fee applies to any app utilizing the App Store’s in-app purchase function, Apple is no stranger to wanting to keep money in its ecosystem and take a cut out of everything that touches its prized flagship products. But, when it comes to crypto technology and related Web3 products, they are decentralized, which means Apple would have no real way of taking a cut out of them. To me, the updated App Store guidelines look like a desperate attempt at threatening competitors and protecting its monopoly. After all, some bigger cracks may be showing, and Apple might be more worried than it probably wants you to know. As Cointelegraph recently reported, tech talent is migrating more and more to Web3 while tech giants like Apple, Google and Netflix undergo layoffs and hiring freezes. Data looking at the impact of the current economic downturn tells us that 700 tech startups have experienced layoffs within the last year, “impacting at least 93,519 employees globally,” in a move that resulted in an “overwhelming amount of talent flocking to early-stage Web3 companies.”Related: Facebook and Twitter will soon be obsolete thanks to blockchain technologyAs Web3 looms, is Apple doomed? Of course not. Although it’s no longer the world’s most valuable company (Saudi Aramco overtook it in market capitalization in May), the iPhone maker is still a colossal presence in all of our daily lives — that is not going to change anytime soon. What it might need to do, however, is re-think its stance on how it’s going to work with the technologies of the future. As angel investor Daniel Mason pointed out on Twitter, a main takeaway from the updated App Store guidelines is Apple “demonstrating a desire to work with crypto apps (especially games) but on its terms,” which is an extremely Apple-like position.Today, Apple released new rules for crypto apps (especially web3 games) in the App Store.Apple’s stance on NFTs, crypto, and payments will have a massive effect on the industry.A featuring critical points, my takeaways, and winners/losers based on initial reading:— Daniel Mason (@dgmason) October 24, 2022
But, as long as it antagonizes major crypto and NFT exchanges like OpenSea and Magic Eden, payment ramps like Moonpay and “anyone trying to compete with them for either primary or secondary NFT purchases,” as it seems to be prepared to do, Apple may just be prolonging a fight that Web3 is destined to win. Daniele Servadei is the co-founder and CEO of Sellix, an e-commerce platform based in Italy.This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
Čítaj viac