Autor Cointelegraph By Brian Newar

Experts clash on where virtual reality sits in the Metaverse

Virtual reality (VR) will eventually have a place within the Metaverse, but not for the foreseeable future given its slow adoption rates, according to experts.There isn’t much that can rival the experience of having one’s senses almost immersed in a virtual world — which is why many believe that the technology will have a natural fit for the Metaverse. It’s a technology that Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta is betting big on by introducing Meta accounts that it says will allow users to access its Meta Horizons platform more easily through Oculus VR headsets.Founder and CEO of Metaverse platform CEEK Mary Spio is also one waving the VR metaverse flag. In an interview with Cointelgraph, Spio argues that the true power of a Metaverse cannot be realized unless users are totally immersed through the use of VR devices. Spio’s metaverse platform CEEK helps digital content creators, including musicians and athletes, connect directly with their fanbase in a virtual world setting.Spio said that her platform opted for a focus on VR immersion because “the benefits of the Metaverse cannot be fully realized in the non-VR mode.”“Virtual Reality enables full immersion and creates that sense of presence, real emotions, and memories; no different than actually being at a time and place in real life.”However, Spio admits that their metaverse needs to allows for both VR and non-VR accessibility, as content, ease of use, and accessibility are all still required before we see the mass adoption of VR technology. She believes that a “quantum leap will be in the next two to three years” for Metaverse and VR adoption. Janine Yorio, CEO of Metaverse ecosystem developer Everyrealm however disagrees. To Yorio, Metaverse platforms and VR technology should develop exclusively of each other without mutual consideration. By her estimation, a very small portion of Metaverse experiences are being built for VR like CEEK, noting VR making a significant change in the world likely won’t happen in any meaningful horizon. The reasons for this lie in “technological obstacles” and simple human preference for the most casual applications of technology:“People typically game or engage with technology while they are doing something else. That is impossible when using a VR headset which effectively blocks out the rest of the world and makes the user physically vulnerable while using it.”Her view is backed by the numbers as Statista found that the VR market size was about $4.8 billion in 2021 from only 2.4 headsets per hundred households according to Virtual Reality Marketing. Compare that to Web 2.0 Metaverse companies that enjoy a $14.8 trillion market cap and the Metaverse token market worth $7.1 billion according to CoinGecko.Related: The opportunities and risks of Metaverse for small businessesMeanwhile, the creative and technical director at Human Park, Ricky Pearce, took a middle-ground stance on the issue. He told Cointelegraph in an interview that it might be five to ten years before VR becomes a Metaverse-ready item due to developer-side limitations, as well as the various hurdles to mass adoption — though he admitted that VR implementation “isn’t off the cards.”To Pearce, the main hurdle is the headset, which he says Oculus has solved for the most part by making the device more accessible. However, connectivity and gameplay will remain a difficult challenge for least the next five years. Pearce added that some of the limitations of integrating VR and Metaverse may have no solution because of “physical limitations that stop those things from connecting on a fundamental level.”“When we saw VR kickoff, you could see that there was potential. But the mechanical components to be able to deliver a sustained enjoyable experience just weren’t there, and they still aren’t now.”Human Park has not yet implemented VR to its platform, but says it is a possibility for the future.

Čítaj viac

Stablecoin projects need collaboration, not competition: Frax founder

Stablecoin projects need to take a more collaborative approach to grow each other’s liquidity and the ecosystem as a whole, says Sam Kazemian, the founder of Frax Finance.Speaking to Cointelegraph, Kazemian explained that as long as stablecoin “liquidity is growing proportionally with each other” through shared liquidity pools and collateral schemes, there won’t ever be true competition between stablecoins. Kazemian’s FRAX stablecoin is a fractional-algorithmic stablecoin with parts of its supply backed by collateral and other parts backed algorithmically. Kazemian explained that growth in the stablecoin ecosystem is not a “zero-sum game” as each token is increasingly intertwined and reliant on each other’s performance. FRAX uses Circle’s USD Coin (USDC) as a portion of its collateral. DAI, a decentralized stablecoin maintained by the Maker Protocol, also uses USDC as collateral for more than half of the tokens in circulation. As FRAX and DAI continue to expand their market caps, they will likely need more USDC collateral.However, Kazemian pointed out that if one project decides to dump another, it could have negative effects on the ecosystem.“It’s not a popular thing to say, but if Maker dumped its USDC, it would be bad for Circle because of the yield they’re earning from them.”USDC is keyThe current top three stablecoins by marketcap in order from the top are Tether (USDT), USDC, and Binance USD (BUSD). DAI and FRAX are both decentralized stablecoins that take the fourth and fifth places among the top.USDC has had the largest growth over the past year of all three, with market cap more than doubling last July to $55 billion, bringing it nearly within arm’s reach of USDT according to CoinGecko.Kazemian feels that USDC’s proliferation across the industry and arguably greater transparency about its reserves should make it the most valuable stablecoin for collaboration within the ecosystem. He called USDC a “low-risk and low-innovation project,” and acknowledged that it serves as the base layer for further innovation from other stablecoins. He said:“We and DAI are the innovation layer on top of USDC, like the decentralized bank on top of a classical bank.”Algo stablecoins don’t workThough the FRAX stablecoin is partially stabilized algorithmically, Kazemian says that pure algorithmic stablecoins ”just don’t work.”Algorithmic stablecoins like Terra USD (UST), which collapsed in a dramatic fashion in May, maintain their peg through complicated algorithms that adjust supply based on market conditions rather than traditional collateral.“In order to have a decentralized on-chain stablecoin it needs to have collateral. Doesn’t need to be overcollateralized like Maker, but it needs exogenous collateral.”The death spiral in Terra’s ecosystem became evident when UST, which is now known as USTC, lost its peg. The protocol started minting new LUNA tokens to ensure there were enough tokens backing the stablecoin. Rapid minting drove down the price of LUNA, now known as LUNC, which sparked a complete retail sell-off of tokens, dooming any hopes of re-peg.Related: Liquidity protocol uses stablecoins to ensure zero impermanent lossIn the weeks leading up to the UST depeg, Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon stated that his project needed to fractionally back the stablecoin with different forms of collateral, especially BTC. “At the end, even Terra realized that their model wouldn’t work,” Kazemian added, “so they started buying up other tokens.”By the end of May, Terra had sold nearly all of its $3.5 billion worth of BTC.Terra took down other projects in its wake, including fellow algo stablecoin DEI from Deus Finance, which also has failed to return to the dollar peg as of the time of writing.

Čítaj viac

Voyager rejects Alameda buyout offer as it 'harms customers'

Centralized crypto lender Voyager Digital Holdings has rejected an offer from FTX and its investment arm Alameda Ventures to buyout its digital assets on the grounds that the actions “are not value-maximizing” and potentially “harms customers.” In a rejection letter filed in court on July 24 as part of its ongoing bankruptcy proceedings, Voyager’s lawyers denounced the offer made public by FTX, FTX US, and Alameda on July 22 to buy out all of Voyager’s assets and outstanding loans – except the defaulted loan to 3AC.The letter states that making such offers public could jeopardize any other potential deals by subverting “a coordinated, confidential, competitive bidding process,” adding “AlamedaFTX violated many obligations to the Debtors and the Bankruptcy Court.” Voyager’s representatives suggested that their own proposed plan to reorganize the company is better as they say it would promptly deliver all of their customers’ cash and as much of their crypto as possible.You have all heard the terms “hero,” “bailout,” “rescue,” and “help” in reference to FTX saving distressed companies. Voyager, one of the aforementioned companies, disagrees – they think that SBF’s deal is extremely predatory and will actually hurt customers even more. https://t.co/l726t4U4RR pic.twitter.com/NeARz3lRiP— FatMan (@FatManTerra) July 24, 2022Voyager filed for bankruptcy on July 5 in the Southern District of New York for insolvency worth more than $1 billion after crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) defaulted on a $650 million loan from the firm. On July 22, the three companies tied to FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried offered Voyager a deal that would see Alameda would assume all of Voyager’s assets and use FTX or FTX US to sell and disperse them proportionally to users affected by the bankruptcy.In FTX’s press release, Bankman-Fried said that his proposal was a way for Voyager users to recover their losses and move on from the platform:”Voyager’s customers did not choose to be bankruptcy investors holding unsecured claims. The goal of our joint proposal is to help establish a better way to resolve an insolvent crypto business.”Bankman-Fried doubled-down on his firms’ reasoning for proposing to acquire Voyager in a Twitter thread late on July 24. He stated that Voyager’s customers have “been through enough already,” and should be able to claim their assets if they want them sooner than later because bankruptcy proceedings “can take years.”13) Anyway: in the end, we think Voyager’s customers should have the right to quickly claim their remaining assets if they want, without rent seeking in the middle.They’ve been through enough already.— SBF (@SBF_FTX) July 25, 2022

On Sunday, Voyager’s lawyers said the deal, which purports to make Voyager users whole, is essentially just a liquidation of Voyager’s assets “on a basis that advantages AlamedaFTX.”It also outlined six ways in which the proposal could “harm customers”, including capital gains tax consequences, unfairly capping the value of each Voyager user’s account at their July 5 value, and the effective elimination of the VGX token, which would “destroy in excess of $100 million in value immediately.”“The AlamedaFTX proposal is nothing more than a liquidation of cryptocurrency on a basis that advantages AlamedaFTX. It’s a low-ball bid dressed up as a white knight rescue.”The letter also refuted speculation that AlamedaFTX had a greater chance of winning acquisition bids due to ongoing relationships between the two firms, stating: “Nothing could be further from the truth as evidenced by this response.”Bankman-Fried, has been at the center of other acquisition talks in the midst of a dramatic bear market. On July 1, CEO of another centralized crypto lender BlockFi’s Zac Prince penned a deal for FTX to send $240 million in credit to the firm, with a buyout option worth a total of $640 million.Related: SBF: Crypto winter winding down, FTX to turn a profit as it serves as lender of last resortOn July 20, Cointelegraph reported that Bankman-Fried was seeking $400 million in funding for FTX and FTX US to bring their valuations to $32 billion and $8 billion respectively. The new funding rounds are expected to support acquisitions of other crypto firms.

Čítaj viac

BlockFi had $1.8B in outstanding loans in Q2: Report

Centralized crypto lender BlockFi disclosed that as of the end of Q2, it had $1.8 billion in outstanding loans from institutional and retail investors and $600 million in “net exposure.”The disclosure came from its July 21 Transparency Report for Q2 where the firm outlined its risks relating to liquidity and credit, and shared details on its institutional and retail loan portfolios. Of the outstanding loans to borrowers — valued at $1.8 billion — the firm reported that $600 million are uncollateralized loans.Institutional loans accounted for $1.5 billion of the total outstanding loans, while retail loans made up the remaining $300 million. The firm based its holdings and outstanding loan amounts on a Bitcoin (BTC) price of $19,986 as a reference point.We’ve just published our Q2 Transparency Report with a breakdown of our total AUM, retail and institutional loans, and how we manage related liquidity and credit risk.https://t.co/qcdRDcYmNQ— BlockFi (@BlockFi) July 21, 2022BlockFi said it has established guidelines to help it “maintain the liquidity necessary to meet all our obligations under our core business activities, which includes institutional and retail borrowing and trading activities.”Those guidelines stipulate that it will hold at least 10% of the total amount due to clients upon demand in inventory, which will be ready to be returned to clients.It will also hold at least 50% of owed funds in places that can be retrieved and returned to clients within seven days, and will hold at least 90% of the total amounts owed to clients upon demand either in inventory or in loans that can be called back within one year.The new liquidity guidelines come a few weeks after BlockFi and crypto exchange FTX.US signed an agreement to send $400 million to BlockFi as a “credit facility” with the option to acquire the firm for up to $240 million based on performance triggers. The deal came together after major crypto investment enterprise Three Arrows Capital reportedly defaulted on its loan from BlockFi.In a July 20 post outlining its risk management, BlockFi explained that it only provides uncollateralized loans to borrowers it considers “Tier 1” clients. Tier 1 clients are institutional clients who have “a significant capital base, financial statements audited by reputable third parties, and a willingness to be transparent and engaged with” BlockFi.Related: FTX and FTX US seek even more funding following acquisitions: ReportThe clients it considers to be “Tier 2 and Tier 3” clients are not allowed to make uncollateralized loans. 

Čítaj viac

Compass Mining to add 25,000 ASIC miners just weeks after staff cuts

Mere weeks after announcing staff lay-offs and salary cuts, Compass Mining has unveiled expansion plans in the form of a 75 megawatt (MW) hosting partnership with Compute North for its data center in Granbury, Texas.The announcement on July 21 comes only a two weeks after the company retrenched 15% of its employees and implemented salary cuts for its top executives as a means to weather difficult market conditions. It also follows the resignation of key executives including CEO Whit Gibbs and chief finance officer Jodie Fisher in late June, as well as losing one of its Maine-based hosting facilities after allegedly missing payments relating to utility bills and hosting fees. Compass said the newest large-scale deployment will begin in August and continue for several months. The expansion includes plans to deploy 25,000 application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) miners to the existing Wolf Hollow plant site in Granbury, including a variety of next generation Bitcoin miners. According to Compass, the facility is state of the art and powered by a 1.1 gigawatt (GW) combined cycle natural gas fueled plant, which uses advanced gas turbine designs and air cooling to decrease carbon emissions and water dependence.The data center also has a fully curtailable load and can shut down at a moment’s notice should the draw on the grid exceed capacity.This adds to existing Compass facilities across the U.S, Canada and Iceland, with major operations in Texas, Ontario, New Mexico and Florida. Crypto miners in Texas however have had a difficult month as a result of a record-breaking heatwave in the state, which has caused a strain on the energy grid. Major Bitcoin miners have been working with the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) by temporarily shutting down or severely reducing their operations in the state to reduce the toll on the grid. Crypto mining firms are still coming to Texas in droves though, attracted by less regulatory oversight and lower energy costs. Mining stocks hit one-month highDespite the recent heatwave impacting local mining operations, publicly listed mining stocks appear to be performing well, according to NASDAQ data. Three of the biggest miners by market cap are all in the green as of July 22.Related: Bitcoin mining stocks rebound sharply despite a 70% drop in BTC miners’ revenueMarathon Digital Holdings Inc has seen a 99.85% increase in its stock price over the past month, while Riot Blockchain Inc is up 65.65% and Canaan Inc is up 42.27% over the past month. It comes as the price of Bitcoin (BTC) has also reached a one-month high, reaching $22,938 at the time of writing.

Čítaj viac

Získaj BONUS 8 € v Bitcoinoch

nakup bitcoin z karty

Registrácia Binance

Burza Binance

Aktuálne kurzy