Autor Cointelegraph By Brian Newar

ASIC chair troubled by sheer amount of ‘risk-taking’ crypto investors

The chief of Australia’s financial services regulator Joe Longo has raised the alarm over the sheer amount of people that invested in “unregulated, volatile” crypto assets during the pandemic. Longo, chairman of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) made the comments in an Aug. 11 media release for its research conducted in November 2021, which looked into investment behavior following the onset of t COVID-19 pandemic, stating: “We are concerned about the number of people surveyed who reported investing in unregulated, volatile crypto-asset products”The survey found that crypto was the second most common investment product, with 44% of those surveyed reporting holding it. Of those investors, 25% indicated that crypto assets were the only investment class they were involved in. Longo said the research highlights “the appeal of crypto-assets to the market,” but that investors may not know what risks they are taking on.“According to the survey, only 20% of cryptocurrency owners considered their investment approach to be ‘risk-taking’, raising concerns that investors did not understand the risks of this asset class.”He added that considering there are “limited protections” for investors, the lack of understanding among retail investors makes “a strong case for regulating crypto-assets to better protect investors.”Opposition party Senator Andrew Bragg agreed with Longo that there is a need for more regulation and for lawmakers to act swiftly to protect investors. He told Cointelegraph:“The Chair is right to identify this as an issue […] As the Senate Inquiry’s Chair I recommended sweeping reforms to regulate crypto. The government should do some work and do it quickly.”Australian digital assets lawyer Joni Pirovich however told Cointelegraph that there’s been confusion about whether ASIC is properly equipped to oversee token issuers and their tokens. She said:“It is not that tokens are unregulated, rather that there is a grey area about whether the token issuers are effectively regulated and supervised by regulators such as ASIC.”Pirovich, who is the principal at Blockchain & Digital Assets – Services + Law, noted that in Australia, token issuance and trading creates an interesting conundrum for policymakers because once tokens are issued and then traded on the open market, it becomes a matter for crypto exchanges:“There is room for token exchanges to mature and develop best practice standards to better inform their customers too and policy reform should not stifle this.”The ASIC chair remarks come while  crypto trading is still not yet fully regulated in Australia, causing some industry groups to bump heads with representatives at ASIC earlier this year. Related: The Reserve Bank of Australia to explore use cases for CBDCThe Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) oversees financial activity in Australia and has assumed regulatory oversight over cryptocurrency investments in the country.The ASIC survey gathered its data from 1,053 Australian adults at least 18 years old who traded securities, derivatives, or crypto between March 2020 and Nov. 2021.

Čítaj viac

Coming sooner: ETH devs move up the date for Merge

The Ethereum Merge may be coming sooner than planned, after core developers announced a tentative Merge date of Sept. 15, which will see the blockchain transition to Proof-of-Stake.The Ethereum mainnet Merge date came into view after core developers such as Tim Beiko and Prysmatic Labs co-founder Terence Tsao agreed in an Aug. 11 developer call it would be when Total Terminal Difficulty (TTD) hits 58750000000000000000000.This was confirmed in a Github post titled “Tentative mainnet TTD” which was committed to by Beiko on Aug. 11. While the exact date and TTD could be still be changed, the successes of the various testnet merges could be a promising sign that the Ethereum mainnet will transition to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus next month without issue. The new official schedule is at least three days earlier than Ethereum core developer Tim Beiko’s last prediction of Sep. 19.Tentative Mainnet TTD 58750000000000000000000Note: nothing is final until it’s in client release, so do expect changes last minute due to unforeseen circumstances https://t.co/PQ0YOKpk1u— terence.eth (@terencechain) August 11, 2022The lengthy number provided is referred to as the Total Terminal Difficulty (TTD), specifying the end of Proof-of-Work (PoW) and when Proof-of-Stake (PoS) will begin. The TTD is the total difficulty required for the final block that will be mined before the transition to PoS.Before the Merge can be completed, the Bellatrix fork must be performed which will implement the software needed for clients to run the consensus layer. This is scheduled to happen on Sep. 6, roughly 10 days before the Merge.On Aug. 12, the Goerli testnet became the last remaining testnet to successfully perform its own transition to PoS, following the Sepolia merge on Jul. 7 and Ropsten on Jun. 9. After the Merge, the Ethereum network’s energy consumption is expected to go down by more than 99.99%, it will be able to stave off attacks on the network, and scalability will improvePoW miners to hold onHowever, there are rumblings that Ether (ETH) miners, many of whom rely on the income generated from PoW block rewards, will continue running the original PoW version of Ethereum in order to maintain their earning potential.Bitcoin (BTC) and ETH miner and crypto angel investor Chandler Guo, an obvious proponent of PoW chains, is leading the charge for miners to fork the Ethereum network to create an Ethereum PoW (ETHW) chain. Guo seems to think that there is enough room in the industry for two types of Ethereum to exist, and has retweeted a series of opinions supporting the notion.pow pos both ok https://t.co/f6uReMzyca— Chandler Guo (@ChandlerGuo) August 10, 2022

He has vowed to release the code needed to perform an ETH PoW fork that bypasses the difficulty bomb, which is a mechanism that significantly reduces the block reward for miners to disincentivize them from attempting to produce any more blocks. The difficulty bomb will immediately precede the mainnet merge.Related: Is it foolish to expect a massive Ethereum price surge pre- and post-Merge?ETHW is trading about 7.5% down over the past day at $72.5 on Poloniex. Meanwhile, ETH has gained 1.5% over the past 24 hours to $1,881.54 according to CoinGecko.

Čítaj viac

Uniswap Foundation proposal gets mixed reaction over $74M price tag

The Uniswap Labs community has already begun mulling over a new proposal that would form a Uniswap Foundation based in the United States (U.S.), but first, it’s going to cost $74 million.The proposal has garnered mixed feedback from the community so far, with many praising the foundation’s plans to support and expand the Uniswap ecosystem, while others have balked at its hefty price tag. The Aug. 5 proposal was put forth by Uniswap Labs’ former Chief of Staff Devin Walsh and Uniswap Grant Program lead Kenneth Ng, noting the foundation’s main aim is to “support the Protocol’s decentralized growth, reinvigorate governance, and serve as a Protocol advocate” according to Walsh.If it passes a vote, the Uniswap Foundation (UF) would be incorporated in Delaware and headed by Walsh as executive director, while Ng will become head of operations. To make her vision a reality, Walsh has asked for $74 million in UNI tokens over three years, $60 million of which would be used for its own Uniswap Grant Program (UGP), while another $14 million will be used as “operating budget” to build out a team of 12.Uniswap is the world’s largest decentralized exchange (DEX) by trading volume. Uniswap V3, the third version of the DEX has done $793.8 billion in volume over the past 24 hours, putting it on par with centralized exchanges (CEXs) Huobi Global and KuCoin according to CoinGecko.Uniswap founder Hayden Adams proclaimed in an Aug. 4 tweet that he was “Sooo excited about this proposal.” Adams seemed confident that the proposal would pass when he added, “After this passes, the Foundation will be yet another team working towards a future where the Protocol does not just survive — it thrives!”5/ The strength of an ecosystem grows with each additional team building and working towards its success.Imo, after this passes, the Foundation will be yet another team working towards a future where the Protocol does not just survive — it thrives!— hayden.eth (@haydenzadams) August 4, 2022Although the proposal has so far enjoyed a fair amount of support from Adams and others in the Uniswap community, it has run into a significant cohort of detractors who say the price is far too high.Partner at Cinneamhain Ventures Adam Cochran shared his approval for the goals of the UF, but added in an Aug. 4 tweet that the $60 million for the UGP “is misguided at this phase.”1/17So I don’t mind the proposal to create a Uniswap Foundation – and I think its got decent planning.But $60M to UGP is misguided at this phase.Uni Grants Program has thus far deployed ~$7M in grants so and its frankly been underwhelming.https://t.co/Ri3VNOBh6c— Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) August 4, 2022

Cochran pointed out that the $7 million in grants that the current UGP has already issued have been spent on “underwhelming” issues. He concluded that while there have been several worthwhil ventures the UGP has invested in, “I don’t think the current performance merits “Give us $60M + $14M to run it for 3 years.”Related: Aave DAO approving overcollateralized stablecoin splits crypto communityCo-creator of decentralized game Dark Forest Scott Sunarto also felt that the UF’s goals were in line with the protocol’s potential for growth, but that there was too much “fluff” in the proposal. He suggested the UF concentrate efforts on “protocol growth and R&D.”The proposal will be put to a final vote on the Snapshot governance voting platform on Aug. 8 if the current ongoing straw poll passes.UNI is up 1.4% over the past 24 hours, trading at $9.04 according to CoinGecko.

Čítaj viac

Voyager received better buy-out offers than FTX’s, set to return $270M to customers

Beleaguered crypto lender Voyager Digital Holdings says it has received a number of “higher and better” buy-out offers than that offered by AlamedaFTX back in July, contrary to the investment firm’s continued public statements. The company has also just been cleared to return $270 million of customer funds held at the Metropolitan Commercial Bank (MCB) by the judge presiding over its bankruptcy proceedings in New York.In a Second Day Hearing Presentation on Aug. 4, Voyager stated that it has received word from as many as 88 interested parties keen to bailout the company from its financial woes, adding it is in “active discussions” with over 20 potentially interested parties.One of the most high-profile bids came from Alameda Ventures and FTX in July.Alameda had proposed to buy all of Voyager’s assets and outstanding loans except the defaulted loan to Three Arrows Capital, then liquidate the assets and distribute funds in USD through the FTX US exchange.This was rejected by Voyager on July 25 on the grounds that it was not “value-maximizing” for its customers.  The company also noted that it has already received bids through the marketing process that are “higher and better than AlamedaFTX’s proposal,” contrary to alleged “inaccurate” public statements from AlamediaFTX. Source: Voyager Digital Second Day PresentationVoyager stated that it has also separately sent AlamedaFTX a cease and desist letter regarding its “inaccurate” public statements, confirming that AlamedaFTX does not have a “leg up” on other bidders. $270M in customer funds returnedNews about other interested bidders comes at the same time that U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Michael Wiles has given Voyager the all-clear to return a portion of their customer’s cash deposits. According to an Aug. 4 report from the Wall Street Journal, Judge Wiles stated that Voyager had provided a “sufficient basis” for its claim that customers should be access to the custodial account held at Metropolitan Commercial Bank (MCB), which is understood to hold $270 million in cash. [DB] Voyager secures approval to return $270 million in customer cash: WSJ— db (@tier10k) August 4, 2022Voyager had funds stashed in the account at the bank when it filed for bankruptcy on July 5. Those funds were frozen when bankruptcy proceedings began.Related: Deposits at non-bank entities, including crypto firms, are not insured — FDICVoyager Digital CEO Stephen Ehrlich mentioned in July that he intended to return customer funds from MCB as soon as a “reconciliation and fraud prevention process” was completed, and the firm reportedly asked to have the funds in MCB released on July 15.Voyager’s debt amounts to a sum no greater than $10 billion from roughly 100,000 creditors, but is not the only such brokerage, lender, or investment firm in crypto to have befallen hard times for itself and its users. Celsius, Three Arrows Capital, BlockFi, and others have also been swept up in the ongoing saga.

Čítaj viac

Major hacks in play-to-earn crypto games a ‘matter of time’ — Report

“Unsatisfactory” cybersecurity measures among play-to-earn (P2E) crypto games pose a great risk to GameFi projects and their gamers alike, warns blockchain cybersecurity auditor Hacken.In an Aug. 1 report shared with Cointelegraph, Hacken said that data indicates that Gaming Finance (GameFi) projects, the category which P2E games would fall under, often “put profits above security” by releasing products without taking appropriate precautions against hackers.“GameFi projects […] do not follow even the most essential cybersecurity recommendations, leaving malicious actors numerous entry points for attacks.”P2E games often incorporate nonfungible tokens (NFTs) in their ecosystems in addition to crypto. The largest projects, such as Axie Infinity (AXS) and Stepn (GMT) use a wide array of products designed to enhance the gaming experience, such as token bridges, blockchain networks, or physical merchandise.Hacken researchers found that based on data collected by crypto security ranking service CER.live.,  there were severe deficiencies in GameFi cybersecurity in particular. It found that out of 31 GameFi tokens studied, none received the top security ranking AAA, while 16 received the worst D score.Rankings for each project were determined by weighting various aspects of their cybersecurity, such as token audits, whether they have a bug bounty and insurance, and if the team is public.Hacken’s report explained that GameFi projects typically scored low as it found that no P2E projects had insurance coverage which could help projects recover funds immediately in the instance of a hack.The lack of insurance is partially confirmed by crypto insurance firm InsurAce’s chief marketing officer Dan Thomson, who told Cointelegraph on Thursday that it was not covering any P2E projects.The report also found that only two projects have an active bug bounty program in place. Axie Infinity and Aavegotchi have bug bounties that award monetary compensation to white hat hackers for finding bugs in the project’s code.Finally, it found that while 14 projects have received a token audit, only five have completed a platform audit which could find potential security holes in the project’s entire ecosystem. These include Aavegotchi, The Sandbox, Radio Caca, Alien Worlds, and DeFi Kingdoms.The report also pointed to token bridges as a vulnerability for P2E games. Axie Infinity’s Ronin token bridge was the site of one of the crypto industry’s largest hacks ever when it lost over $600 million in tokens in March.Related: $2B in crypto stolen from cross-chain bridges this year: ChainalysisAs P2E games grow in popularity, there will likely be an increase in the number of security exploits and dollar value stolen from projects, said Hacken. The firm has advised gamers to perform their own security check of projects before sinking a large sum of money into them.“And, of course, keep in mind that investing in P2Es remains a potentially profitable but quite risky affair.”On Aug. 3, crypto analyst Miles Deutscher asked rhetorically where the next crypto security concern may come from. Deutscher may have his answer. We went from: > Meme coins not being safe > DeFi ponzis not being safe > Stablecoins not being safe > Top 10 L1s not being safe > Bridges not being safe > CEXs not being safe > Wallets not being safe What’s next..— Miles Deutscher (@milesdeutscher) August 4, 2022

Čítaj viac

Získaj BONUS 8 € v Bitcoinoch

nakup bitcoin z karty

Registrácia Binance

Burza Binance

Aktuálne kurzy