Autor Cointelegraph By Anthony Clarke

How blockchain technology is changing the way people invest

Over a decade after the release genesis block on the Bitcoin network, blockchain technology has changed how people invest their money, with many platforms in the crypto space having much more relaxed requirements for investors when compared to traditional finance. It’s easier for investors to buy into cryptocurrency when compared to traditional assets. Anybody can download a free Bitcoin (BTC) or multi-crypto wallet and sign up for one of the many available cryptocurrency exchanges. Many exchanges still don’t require users to verify their identity, while others only require ID verification once certain limits have been reached.Compare this to buying stocks, where almost every platform has Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures that users must complete before buying their first stock. On top of this, users can only buy stocks from publicly listed companies and cannot own any shares from a private company. On the other hand, crypto investors can invest in tokens that public or private companies have created. Investors in the crypto space can also participate in early-stage funding rounds, including seed stage funding. In traditional markets, usually only accredited investors and high-net-worth individuals are allowed to participate. In contrast, seed-stage funding in crypto projects can allow anyone with a wallet to take part. It’s all at the discretion of the founding team. Jeremy Musighi, head of growth at Balancer — an automated portfolio manager and trading platform on Ethereum — told Cointelegraph: “Crypto investors have access to a level of transparency that goes way beyond what’s possible in other asset classes. In contrast to stock market investors who can analyze quarterly reports written by a self-reporting company, a crypto investor can permissionlessly dig into data on a decentralized protocol’s performance and track key metrics in real-time or on a historical basis.”Musighi continued to say, “The transparency of communication between a crypto project’s core contributors amongst themselves and with the wider community is also lightyears ahead of the way publicly traded companies operate. Access to accurate and thorough information is key to investing and I think that’s night and day when comparing crypto to any other asset class.”Due to the lack of centralization and lower barriers to entry for crypto investors, the industry has seen a lot of popularity in developing countries. In Nigeria, for example, 35% of the population aged 18 to 60 (33.4 million people) have owned or traded crypto this year, with 52% (17.36 million) holding half of their assets in crypto. This is due mainly to the lack of access to affordable traditional financial services in the nation. Cryptocurrency is an easier and more widely accessible alternative to traditional financial (TradFi) services. TradFi usually comes with restrictions and red tape that make it different for the average joe to partake in.Cryptocurrency has also attracted younger investors into the space, with competition between friends and family being one of the driving factors behind this. Unfortunately, many of these young investors mistakenly believe that the crypto market is regulated, despite its low barrier to entry. Easier access to financial tools may attract younger investors who may not meet the requirements to participate in traditional finance.Musighi, believes that younger investors are more inclined toward cryptocurrency since they have grown up around technology, saying, “Younger investors are more tech-native; they spend more time online, they recognize the value of digital assets more naturally, and they more easily grasp the concept of cryptocurrency. It’s no surprise that the digital generation is more attracted to digital money.”Recent: Bitcoin Lightning Network vs Visa and Mastercard: How do they stack up?Misha Lederman, director of communications at Klever — a decentralized crypto wallet — told Cointelegraph, “Anyone with a smartphone and a passion for learning can invest in cryptocurrencies. Wall Street has played the stock market and commodities markets by different rules than Main Street for decades. With Bitcoin and crypto, a new generation of average investors is able to participate, compete and accumulate early and fairly in the most exciting industry of our time.”How investors are making money in the crypto spaceCryptocurrency isn’t just easier for investors to access and provides multiple avenues for investors to make money. There are different sub-sectors within the crypto market, including token sales and decentralized finance (DeFi).Token sales were one of the first sub-sectors to increase in popularity within the crypto space. Token sales are fundraising rounds where investors can buy a crypto project’s native tokens before they hit the open market. The idea is that investors can “get in early” and make a profit once the tokens are listed. This is due to the expectation that a token’s price will increase after a listing due to speculation and increased liquidity. Token sales come in different forms, including:The ICO market first peaked in popularity, surpassing the $1 billion mark in 2017. ICOs and the newer iterations (IEOs, IDOs, IGOs, etc.) were attractive to investors since they were initially very easy to get into, with users needing only a crypto wallet to participate. Now, however, there are additional requirements such as KYC (for IEOs), whitelists and limits on how much investors can contribute to a crowdsale. Regardless of these new requirements, it’s still relatively easier for users to get involved in token sales than TradFi token sales. Initial public offerings, for example, have tighter requirements. Also, some platforms require investors to have at least $250,000 in their account or to have traded three times before they are eligible.DeFi is another sector in the crypto space that has attracted a lot of investor interest. This is because the sector has many protocols within the space, including yield farming — a process where liquidity is provided to DEXs in exchange for rewards in a project’s native token, crypto lending and borrowing platforms and staking, which enables investors to earn interest on crypto assets locked into a particular network.Such platforms usually require investors to have a personal noncustodial wallet where they control the private keys. Investors need to connect this wallet to a protocol they’ll be using. For example, many investors use MetaMask to connect to DEXs and other platforms when engaging in DeFi. Users then interact with protocols directly with their related smart contracts to carry staking, liquidity farming or lending/borrowing. Decentralized finance has given investors more control over their finances than TradFi, where users normally have an asset manager or broker to handle the processes. However, some protocols automate specific processes within the DeFi sector. HyperDex, for example, is a platform that enables standard financial products to be accessed via DeFi. The platform works via containers called cubes, similar to liquidity pools on DEXs. Smart contracts power these cubes, and users can choose a cube according to their preferences. In addition, they can engage in different protocols, including fixed income staking, algorithm trading and race trading, a protocol similar to prediction markets.Yearn.Finance is another platform that uses smart contracts, in this case, to automate the process of yield farming. The smart contracts automatically switch liquidity pools based on which one has the highest payout. So, while DeFi does require users to be more hands-on with their investments, there are still protocols that can handle particular tasks via smart contracts. Contrast this to traditional finance, where a third party would be required to handle tasks instead of automated smart contracts that keep the user close to the protocol and their holdings.Volatility is a double-edged swordVolatility is another factor in the crypto market that has affected how people invest their money. Since cryptocurrencies are much more volatile than traditional assets, investors can expect much higher returns. For example, the average return in the stock market is 10% annually. Conversely, cryptocurrency investors have seen anywhere from 50% in a month with blue chip coins like Ether (ETH) to 100% in a day with memecoins like Dogecoin (DOGE). However, increased volatility brings a possibility of a higher downside, too. For example, this year alone, many cryptocurrencies, including 72 of the top 100 coins, dropped over 90% during the recent market downturn. While the cause of this high volatility may not be known, experts have speculated that it could be due to factors such as lack of regulation and a low amount of institutional money in the space. Regardless of the reason for the high volatility, many investors have tried to capitalize on it. For example, many investors in the United Kingdom tend to see cryptocurrency as a “get rich quick” scheme, according to a study covered by Cointelegraph in 2019. Many of the respondents in the study lacked an understanding of cryptocurrencies and were more likely to invest without any due diligence. Ellie Le Rest, CEO of Colony — an Avalanche ecosystem accelerator — spoke to Cointelegraph about volatility in the crypto space, stating:“We believe volatility is a good thing, simply because it did draw profit-seeking investors into the marketplace and shall continue to do so. Their presence encourages the development of even more sophisticated protocols and reliable, scalable infrastructure.”Lack of research by investors has led to many of them getting scammed by fraudulent projects in the space. For example, over $1 billion worth of crypto was lost to scammers in 2021, according to a report covered by Cointelegraph. The same report noted that nearly half of all crypto-related scams came from social media platforms. “It is still early days for DeFi, so it entails a lot of risks. Hacks and exploits have cost billions of dollars. In order to make DeFi a safe and attractive tool for new investors, DeFi industry players need to prioritize user protection and increased security as a top priority.” says Lederman, continuing:“That being said, when understanding the risks involved and properly adjusting for those risks, then DeFi can open up a new world of opportunities for young crypto investors in place of centralized lenders or legacy financial institutions.”Findings further show that many investors are not researching the coins or projects they invest in. Instead, they tend to follow recommendations by social media or YouTube influencers with the hopes of striking it rich. Despite this, there are still many savvy investors in the space. For example, in March this year, many investors followed their favorite projects and profited when their native tokens rose in value after large announcements. This process is known as “buying the rumor and selling the news.” Investors can find insights by joining the project community and finding out about future announcements and news. Pros and cons of the crypto market for investorsThe benefits for investors in the crypto space are reduced entry barriers due to less red tape and regulation in the space. Investors also have more control over their funds since they don’t need to rely on a broker or middleman to manage their holdings. Additional benefits include a higher potential for returns through holding and trading crypto and the many protocols within the DeFi sector.Recent: Tornado Cash saga highlights legal issues affecting the crypto marketThe drawbacks to investors include a higher chance of loss due to user error, scams and hacking in the space. However, one of the biggest downsides is the volatility of the crypto market in general, with huge upsides usually followed by large drawbacks. Investors have an easier path toward building wealth through cryptocurrency since it is much easier to get into than traditional finance. However, investors still need to perform due diligence on the projects they intend to invest in and risk only the money they can afford to lose.

Čítaj viac

Blockchain’s environmental impact and how it can be used for carbon removal

Climate change has become an important issue over the years due to concerns over environmental changes caused by the emission of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere. Conversations have even reached the crypto space, and blockchain technology is being considered a potential tool to reduce carbon emissions.Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) that use the proof-of-work (PoW) mining algorithm have come under scrutiny due to their alleged energy expenditure. To see where this scrutiny comes from, it first needs to be known how much energy is used when mining PoW cryptocurrencies. Unfortunately, estimating the amount of energy necessary to mine Bitcoin and other PoW cryptocurrencies cannot be calculated directly. Instead, it can be estimated by looking at the network’s hash rate and the power usage of the mining setups of expensive graphics cards. Initially, Bitcoin could be mined with a basic computer, but as the network matured, the mining difficulty increased, requiring nodes to use more computing power to mine a new block. Due to the increased power requirements, to mine Bitcoin today, one would need multiple graphics cards as well as cooling systems to stop them from overheating. This is what has led to the high energy usage of PoW networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum.According to the New York Times, the Bitcoin network uses around 91 terawatt-hours (91 TWh) of electricity annually, which is more energy used than countries like Finland. Other sources put this number at 150 TWh per year, which is more energy than Argentina, a nation of 45 million people. However, as mentioned earlier, calculating Bitcoin’s energy usage is not a straightforward task, and there have been disagreements about the actual energy usage of the Bitcoin network. For example, Digiconomist claimed that Bitcoin uses 0.82% of the world’s power (204 TWh) while Ethereum uses 0.34% (85 TWh). Ethereum developer Josh Stark disputed the accuracy of these claims and highlighted Digiconomist’s tendencies to place estimations on the higher end while pointing out data from the University of Cambridge that estimated Bitcoin’s actual consumption to be 39% lower (125 TWh).Additional sources have agreed with Bitcoin’s energy expenditure being on the lower level. The Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index estimates that the Bitcoin network uses 92 TWh of energy per year. A research report by Michel Khazzaka also claims that traditional banking systems use 56 times more energy than Bitcoin.R. A. Wilson, chief technology officer of 1GCX — a global digital asset and carbon credit exchange — told Cointelegraph, “To say that Bitcoin is ‘bad’ for the environment leaves a number of nuances and important conversations unexplored. It’s true that Bitcoin and other proof-of-work chains do consume larger quantities of energy than blockchains that operate on a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism. However, there are a number of other considerations to take into account when analyzing and understanding the energy consumption of Bitcoin and blockchain in general.”Recent: How Bitcoin whales make a splash in markets and move prices“For example, the sheer amount of energy consumed doesn’t directly equate to environmental impact. It is also important to understand where that energy is coming from. Currently, Bitcoin miners use around 55%–65% renewable energy, which is impressive for an industry so relatively young. Comparatively, the sustainable energy mix in the United States is only 30%. Bitcoin can, therefore, continue to incentivize the rise in renewable energy sources within the crypto mining industry and in the U.S. more broadly.”There may be no clear consensus on the environmental impact of cryptocurrency mining on PoW networks. Still, there has been a push toward using blockchain to become more energy-efficient and improve the environment. As a result, sustainable energy sources for Bitcoin mining have also grown by almost 60% this year. Blockchain is also being used to help remove carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gasses from the atmosphere. In some areas, blockchain technology is being used alongside carbon credits to try to improve the atmosphere.What are carbon credits?It is common to see the terms “carbon offset” and “carbon credit” used interchangeably, but they have different meanings. A carbon offset refers to an action that intends to compensate for the emission of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere. Examples of carbon offsets include planting trees, reforestation and using renewable energy sources instead of fossil fuels. A carbon credit permits an organization to produce a certain amount of greenhouse gasses depending on how many credits they own. One carbon credit represents one ton of carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gasses. Organizations receive a set amount of credits, meaning they can only produce a limited amount of greenhouse emissions. Entities that produce emissions above the limit must purchase more credits, while entities that produce emissions below the limit can sell any leftover credits. The scheme works by providing a financial incentive for polluting entities to produce fewer greenhouse gasses. If their emissions stay below the limit, they can save or make money (by selling credits), while they lose money by producing emissions above the limit.Wilson believes that blockchain technology can help the carbon offsets industry: “The carbon offsets industry has the potential to scale to a multitrillion-dollar market over the next several years, but it currently suffers from a number of obstacles including fraud and duplication of credits. The immutability and security of blockchain technology can help solve these challenges by ensuring that all records of carbon credit sales are responsibly and accurately tracked.”“While blockchain technology alone cannot solve these problems in the market, a combination of blockchain and associated infrastructural services such as digital exchanges, a global registry and Anti-Money Laundering/Know Your Customer for purchase, creation and retirement can help to vastly improve existing bottlenecks,” he continued.How organizations use blockchain to reduce emissionsEarthFund is one platform where users can donate cryptocurrency, mainly Tether (USDT), to different environmentally friendly causes on the platform. The platform also has a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) and houses a treasury that allows DAO members to decide how the funds are used. Smaller communities within the ecosystem choose which causes get highlighted for donations. Carbon capture and storage, as well as renewable technologies and conservation, are some of the areas that are explored when it comes to improving the environment. Toucan is another platform that has created tokenized carbon credits, which are crypto tokens backed by real-world carbon offset credits. The carbon offsets are represented on-chain as Base Carbon Tonnes (BCT). In November 2021, Mark Cuban stated that he had bought $50,000 worth of carbon offsets every 10 days and placed them on-chain as BCT.Traditional organizations and governing bodies have also looked to blockchain technology as a possible solution to reducing carbon emissions. Last year, for example,the United Nations Environment Programme and other governing bodies came together at the Middle East and North Africa Climate Week to look at blockchain’s potential for tackling climate change. In April 2022, Algorand announced that its blockchain was entirely carbon neutral. This is achieved through its pure proof-of-stake mining algorithm, which doesn’t involve any mining but instead relies on a process where validators are randomly selected to verify the next block. Recent: Proof-of-work: The Bitcoin artists on minting NFTs and OpenSeaOrganizations in the crypto space are looking toward improving the ecosystem through blockchain-tracked donations to carbon removal projects, tokenized carbon credits and carbon-neutral blockchains.Finally, Ethereum 2.0 is on the horizon, which will see the blockchain network transition from a PoW consensus algorithm to proof-of-stake, as well as some additional changes. PoS does not require mining hardware to validate blocks, drastically reducing its energy consumption. Due to a lower amount of energy being used to power the network, fewer fossil fuels will be burned, reducing the amount of carbon emitted into the atmosphere.

Čítaj viac

Decentralized finance faces multiple barriers to mainstream adoption

Decentralized finance (DeFi) is a growing market popular with experienced crypto users. However, there are some roadblocks regarding mass adoption when it comes to the average non-technical investor. DeFi is a blockchain-based approach to delivering financial services that don’t rely on centralized intermediaries but instead use automated programs. These automated programs are known as smart contracts, enabling users to automatically trade and move assets on the blockchain.Protocols in the DeFi space include decentralized exchanges (DEXs), lending and borrowing platforms and yield farms. Since there are no centralized intermediaries, it’s easier for users to get involved in the DeFi ecosystem, but there are also increased risks. These risks include vulnerabilities in a protocol’s codebase, hacking attempts and malicious protocols. Combined with the high volatility of the crypto market in general, these risks can make it harder for DeFi to reach wide adoption with average users. However, workarounds and advancements in the blockchain space can address these concerns.Regulatory concerns with DeFi Regulation can benefit the DeFi space, but it also conflicts with the core principles of decentralization. Decentralization means a protocol, organization or application has no central authority or owner. Instead, a protocol is built with smart contracts executing its main functions while multiple users interact with the protocol. For example, smart contracts take care of the staking and swaps with a DEX, while users provide liquidity for the trading pairs. What can regulators do to prevent an anonymous team from pumping up a token’s value before withdrawing liquidity from DEXs, otherwise known as rug pulling? Due to the decentralized nature of the DeFi ecosystem, regulators will face challenges when trying to maintain a certain level of control within the space.Despite the challenges, regulation isn’t completely out of the picture regarding decentralized finance. In Q4 2021, the Financial Action Task Force released an updated version of their guidance to virtual assets document. The update outlined how developers of DeFi protocols could be held accountable in a crisis. While the protocol may be automated and decentralized, the founders and developers could be called virtual asset service providers (VASPs). According to the state where they are based, they may also need to be regulated. Regarding regulation within DeFi, platforms can also build protocols that comply with regulatory requirements. For example, Phree is a platform that builds decentralized protocols while considering regulatory concerns where possible. One of the ways they do this is by working with traditional finance entities to build DeFi protocols that meet standard regulation requirements. This would entail adding processes like Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering checks to DeFi platforms like DEXs and lending or borrowing platforms. In addition, making traditional finance (TradFi) compatible with the DeFi ecosystem would help to spread its adoption due to the dominance of organizations in the TradFi space.Ajay Dhingra, head of research at smart exchange Unizen, told Cointelegraph, “Incompatibility with traditional finance ecosystem is one of the major challenges. There is a need to connect the CeFi regulatory framework with on-chain identities and real-time regulatory reporting so that Defi becomes accessible to financial institutions that deal in trillions.”Recent: Education and aesthetics: Bringing more women into the MetaverseCentral bank digital currencies (CBDC) have been suggested as an answer to stablecoins after the Terra algorithmic stablecoin collapse earlier this year. Swiss National Bank executive Thomas Moser previously told Cointelegraph regulators might favor centralized stablecoins over decentralized ones. However, he also mentioned that it would likely take time and that current financial regulations could make the DeFi ecosystem obsolete due to conflicting principles.Security concerns within the DeFi ecosystemSecurity issues are a major concern within the DeFi sector, with malicious actors in the space taking advantage of vulnerabilities within bridging protocols and decentralized applications (DApps). Adam Simmons, chief strategy officer of RDX Works — builders of the Radix protocol — told Cointelegraph, “The dirty secret of DeFi right now is that the entire public ledger technology stack has a huge number of known security issues, as demonstrated with the billions of dollars lost in hacks and exploits in the last few years.”Vulnerability exploits are still taking place in the DeFi space. Recently the Nomad token bridge was drained of $160 million worth of funds. It is also estimated that $1.6 billion worth of funds has been stolen from DeFi protocols this year alone. Lack of security within the DeFi space makes it less likely for new users to get involved while discouraging people who have fallen victim to protocol exploits. In order to combat this problem, there needs to be a greater emphasis on vetting protocols within the space to discover vulnerabilities before hackers can take advantage. There are already platforms like CertiK that carry out audits on blockchain-based protocols by checking the smart contract code, so that’s a good start. However, the industry needs to see increased auditing of DApps before they go live to protect users in the crypto space.User experience issuesUser experience (UX) is another potential roadblock for users who want to get involved in the DeFi ecosystem. The way investors interact with wallets, exchanges and protocols isn’t a straightforward intuitive process, leading to some users losing their funds due to human error. For example, in November 2020, a trader spent $9,500 in fees to execute a $120 trade on Uniswap after getting the “gas limit” and “gas price” input boxes confused.In another example, a rock nonfungible token (NFT) worth $1.2 million was sold for less than a cent when a user listed it for sale at 444 WEI instead of 444 Ether (ETH). These examples are known as fat finger errors, where users lose money due to mistakes they make when inputting values for prices or transaction fees. For DeFi to be widely adopted by the masses, the process must be simple for regular, everyday people. However, that is currently not the case. In order to use a DeFi application, users need to own a noncustodial wallet, or a wallet where they control the private keys. They also need to back up the recovery phrase and keep it in a safe place. When interacting with a DApp, users need to connect their wallet, which can sometimes be complicated, especially when using a mobile wallet. Recent: Lido’s market dominance and Ethereum decentralization post-MergeIn addition, when sending or receiving payments, users need to copy the addresses involved in the transactions, and in some cases, they need to input the amount of gas they want to spend on a transaction. If a user doesn’t understand this process, they could use a low gas setting and end up waiting hours for their transaction to be sent since the gas fee is so low. The process gets even more complex when dealing with tokens built on networks such as the ERC-20 and BEP-20 standards. When you transfer these tokens, you need to pay for the transaction with the cryptocurrency of the network it belongs to. For example, if you want to send an ER-20 token, for example, USD Coin (USDC), you’ll need to hold ETH in your wallet to pay for the gas, which adds more complexity to the transaction.Developers in the DeFi space need to make the ecosystem more user-friendly for beginners and regular non-technical users in the space. Building wallets and DApps that prevent fat finger errors (by auto-inputting values, for example) is a good start. This is already the case with centralized exchanges, but it needs to be brought into decentralized platforms and noncustodial wallets for the DeFi sector to grow.

Čítaj viac

How NFTs can boost fan engagement in the sports industry

Nonfungible tokens (NFTs) have grown a lot in popularity since the release of CryptoKitties in 2017, with the sector expected to move over $800 billion in the next two years. Some of the most well-known use cases for NFTs are picture-for-proof projects such as the Bored Ape Yacht Club and play-to-earn gaming projects. NFTs have also attracted attention from the sports industry, with professional sports leagues setting up their own platforms for fans to engage with their favorite teams or players, but that will be discussed later in this story.NFTs are unique and non-interchangeable pieces of code stored on the blockchain. These strings of alpha-numerical code can be linked to assets such as artwork or digital and physical goods. NFTs are created through a process known as minting, and creators can set a limit on the number of NFTs they want to mint, creating scarcity.Scarcity is a phenomenon that has always applied to physical assets due to them being physically built with finite resources. However, scarcity has never existed with digital goods since they can be easily replicated. NFTs have changed this, and we are now seeing a growing collectibles market in the digital world.How are NFTs used for fan engagement?When it comes to sports, fans feel so strongly about their favorite player or teams that they interact with them in every way possible. Engagement ranges from watching or attending live games, buying merchandise or attending signing events. Fans want to get closer to their favorite teams and players, which presents sports teams and leagues with opportunities to generate additional revenue.Sports leagues, in particular, have noticed the value of fan engagement and have gone on to create platforms where fans can buy, own and trade digital keepsakes. One well-known example is the National Basketball League’s NBA Top Shots NFT marketplace, where fans can buy, sell and trade basketball video clips. Video clips on the platform are known as NBA Top Shot moments, and each one shows a different highlight from a basketball match. The marketplace launched in 2020 as a joint venture between the NBA and Dapper Labs, the creators of CryptoKitties. It generated over $230 million in sales within a year of its launch.Some video clips are sold in packs, similar to physical trading cards like Pokèmon and Yu-Gi-Oh. There is also an element of gamification with different rarity tiers, ranging from “common” to “legendary,” a standard system in role-playing games. The rarer video clips are more likely to fetch a higher price than the more common highlights, increasing their perceived value as a collectible.The NBA isn’t alone when it comes to sports leagues building their own engagement platforms. National Football League and the National Hockey League are working on their own NFT platforms, while Major League Baseball has already released its NFT marketplace.It’s not just sports leagues that have built fan engagement platforms — the concept is proving popular with non-sports league organizations coming into the space. For example, Fanzee is an upcoming platform that raised $2 million to build a marketplace and ecosystem where sports fans can complete challenges such as quizzes and games to increase their fan level and trade NFT collectibles. Recent: Metaverse visionary Neal Stephenson is building a blockchain to uplift creatorsSimilar to NBA Top Shots, there’s an element of gamification. In this case, sports clubs can create interactive challenges such as quizzes based on previous matches to test how closely fans have followed the game. In addition, fans can earn experience points and NFTs based on their game interaction. Experience points raise their “fan level,” which is displayed on a leaderboard, with fans earning prizes based on their rank.“Gamification is a great way to drive engagement. Having a fun and exciting platform experience helps draw people in. There’s got to be a story though, even if it’s a lighthearted one like GoblinTown.” Max Luck, ecosystem growth lead at the interoperability-focused Flare Network, told Cointelegraph, adding: “NFTs are pretty unique in how they help to keep communities active and engaged — or ‘sticky,’ especially with secondary marketplaces springing up across different ecosystems and the potential for NFT use in various gaming metaverses. Also, a major opportunity for memes.” How are fan engagement platforms changing the sports industry?Fan engagement platforms are bringing real-world industries such as collectibles into the Web3 space. Nonfungible tokens are a great way to attract younger and more tech-savvy users by adding modern ways for fans to interact with their favorite teams and players while also creating additional revenue streams for sports leagues.Luck agrees that NFTs are a great way to get young fans engaged with their favorite teams and players, “NFTs are kinda like marketing tools that carry the power to bring newcomers to the game. This is especially true among younger fans who have collectibles on their phones and can share their enthusiasm and experiences with friends at school or college.” “Nowadays, tech can drive discovery, whereas previous generations might have watched sports with their families at home or in the stadium and developed their support there,” Luck continued, “The success of attracting newcomers would depend on how simple and easy platforms can make it for them to get hold of their first NFTs with accessible UI/UX — and how prohibitive the costs are.”Digital assets could have a significant effect on how close sports fans are to their favorite teams if they are used correctly. It will be easier for fans to keep up with the teams and athletes they care about the most. Because of this, sports organizations have a chance to use digital assets to their advantage. It won’t be surprising if most sports leagues have their own NFT platforms where fans could interact with blockchain-based assets in the next few years. However, the focus should be on the engagement of the fans instead of trying to earn a quick buck simply by selling tokens. By focusing on fan engagement, these platforms can see increased adoption since fans will be more likely to introduce new users to the platforms. This will also improve user retention since fans will be using these platforms for their personal enjoyment instead of trying to make money by flipping tokens or digital assets they have bought. If the bear market has taught us anything, speculative users always disappear when the market stops moving upward. Félix Le Breton, digital revenue manager at French esports organization Team Vitality, told Cointelegraph, “NFTs can be a good way to attract young fans, as long as you stay away from the speculative aspect of it. Obviously the young generation are familiar with the principle of digital ownership and it is easy for them to get onboard.” Recent: Decentralized storage providers power the Web3 economy, but adoption still underwayPlatforms that take a user-first approach focusing on high engagement and user retention will see the most success when it comes to fan engagement platforms, in addition to improving user education around how NFTs will also help to bring the sports industry into the Web3 space. On average, 76% of avid sports fans worldwide are open to learning more about NFTs, so there is an excellent opportunity for organizations in the sports industry to introduce blockchain-based assets to their consumers.NFTs can change the sports world by bringing offline activities into the online world. In the past, fans collected trading cards, signed T-shirts and footballs and traded printed-out pictures of their favorite players. As the world increasingly becomes digital, younger fans will find new ways to engage with their favorite teams and players through blockchain technology.

Čítaj viac

Proof-of-time vs proof-of-stake: How the two algorithms compare

Consensus algorithms are processes where validators (also known as nodes or miners) within a blockchain network agree on the current state of the network. This mainly entails agreeing on whether a transaction submitted by a validator is authentic. Fraudulent or inaccurate transactions are rejected by the network assuming all validators are acting fairly with no malicious intent. Validators are rewarded with cryptocurrency for submitting accurate and authentic transactions, whilst malicious actors are penalized depending on the consensus protocol. For example, in proof-of-work (PoW) networks like Bitcoin (BTC), validators have to spend energy via expensive hardware to validate transactions, and if successful, they gain new tokens. If they act maliciously they gain nothing and the loss comes from the wasted energy used in submitting the fraudulent or inaccurate transaction.In proof-of-stake (PoS) users stake tokens and receive additional tokens for submitting authentic transactions, while losing a portion for submitting wrong transactions. In proof-of-time (PoT) protocols the principle is the same, with validators receiving additional tokens for submitting authentic transactions but lose tokens for submitting inaccurate or malicious transactions.While PoS and PoT share some similarities, they are two very different protocols.What is proof-of-stake?PoS is a consensus algorithm that works by users staking their tokens as collateral by locking them into a smart contract. The system works by selecting a validator, also known as miners or nodes, to process a block of transactions. The validator has to validate the transactions inside the block to ensure that there is no inaccurate information contained within.Next, the validator submits the block to the blockchain and if the block has been validated correctly, they receive additional tokens as a reward. If a validator behaves in a malicious or lazy manner, usually by submitting incorrect or fraudulent transactions, they lose a portion of the tokens they have staked.Validators who staked a higher amount of tokens are more likely to be selected to verify transactions. Staking a higher amount of tokens also earns the validator additional rewards since they typically earn a fixed percentage based on the blockchain network. For example on Ethereum 2.0, validators currently earn 4.2% on their tokens. Validators are also more likely to be selected if they have staked their tokens for a longer period of time.Becoming a validator in the PoS system is open to everyone but the barrier to entry is high due to the popularity of the protocol, with a large number of nodes on PoS blockchains. The more nodes a network has, the larger amount of tokens a user will need to stake to become a validator.Due to this, staking pools, which are run by validators, are typically used by average crypto users who want to stake their tokens. In this system, a user deposits their tokens into a pool and the tokens are staked by validators on the token owner’s behalf. In return for this, users typically pay a “pool fee,” which is a percentage of the tokens they earn from staking.What is proof-of-time?Proof-of-time (PoT) is a consensus algorithm that uses a voting system to choose network validators and focuses on how long a network validator has been active within the network as well as their reputation. The protocol was developed by Analog and is based on delegated proof-of-stake (dPoS) which is a modified version of PoS.Proof-of-time refers to its ledger as a Timechain and works by using a ranking score, verifiable delay function (VDF), and staked tokens to determine who gets to add a new transaction to the ledger. The ranking system works by giving a score to network validators based on their age and past performance. Validators receive higher scores for being trustworthy and being active within the network for a longer time. Staking a larger amount of tokens also makes it more likely that a validator will be selected.Recent: FTX CEO and Solana co-founder offer advice for building Web3 ecosystemsPoT is similar to dPoS since users on the network vote to decide which delegates can validate the next block. However, there are some differences in the voting process, with PoT having multiple voting stages. During the first voting stage, validators, known as time electors, submit a block that contains data including transactions to be added to the Timechain. If the block is accepted, the block is validated, with all transactions within the block being processed.Time electors are chosen through a selection process that looks at the electors ranking score and number of tokens staked. The process uses this information as well as VDF to randomly select a time elector, and only one can get chosen at a time.Time electors also run a VDF to determine if they have been chosen to add a new block to the Timechain. If they have been selected, they validate the block, generate a VDF proof and submit both of the data to the rest of the nodes in the Timechain.During the second stage, the block and VDF proof is sent to 1,000 other time electors to be double-checked before being added to the Timechain. If most of the time electors agree to accept the transaction it is added to the Timechain.How the two consensus protocols comparePoS and PoT share a few similarities. Firstly they both require validators to stake tokens as collateral when verifying transactions, with a higher stake increasing the chances of being selected. The main difference is the ranking and voting system used by PoT, followed by an additional verification by 1,000 validators before the transaction is submitted to the ledger.PoS is the more popular and familiar option, being used by Solana, Polkadot, Cardano and Ethereum 2.0. When it comes to advantages, both systems require users to stake tokens instead of expending energy which makes them both energy-efficient alternatives to proof-of-work (PoW). This can also work as a disadvantage since malicious actors with access to a large number of funds can theoretically take control of the network. Recent: Demand for widely used euro stablecoin is huge, says DeFi expertHowever, this is an unlikely scenario. To initiate a 51% attack, for example, a malicious actor would need to own 51% of the tokens within the network, which is very unlikely and extremely risky for the attacker, especially with the more popular blockchains like Ethereum and Cardano. PoT also adds to the security layer by requiring each transaction to be double-checked by a thousand validators with 2/3 of them having to agree on whether the transaction should be added to the ledger.Each blockchain network has particular requirements tailored to the needs of the network. Many blockchains stick to PoW and PoS for their needs, while additional algorithms like PoT, dPoS and proof-of-history (used by Polkadot in combination with PoS) cater to the needs faced by their blockchain networks.

Čítaj viac

Získaj BONUS 8 € v Bitcoinoch

nakup bitcoin z karty

Registrácia Binance

Burza Binance

Aktuálne kurzy