Autor Cointelegraph By Alyssa Exposito

OpenDAO (SOS), LooksRare (LOOKS) and WTF token: 3 airdrops, with 1 scam

NFTs continue to surge with what looks to be no end in sight. Since January 14, 2022 OpenSea notched trading volumes over $1.03 billion, and its latest rival, LooksRare, has eclipsed the platform according to data from DappRadar. Top 8 NFT marketplaces by volume. Source: DappRadar What’s clear is that NFT collectors and traders appear to be shifting their sentiment on where they are seeing value. Since the start of 2022 there’s been an emphasis on “community” with a buzz and advocacy of rewarding users for their participation. OpenSea has already generated more than $3.2 billion in total volume despite many NFT traders feeling that the marketplace betrayed the notions of Web3. These investors are voting with their feet and planning to boycott the marketplace by turning their attention to others who are more “Web3 friendly.”Community-driven NFT marketplace, LooksRare and other platforms have successfully completed a vampire attack, leaving disgruntled OpenSea users migrating away from it for not valuing and rewarding user participation.Participants seem to be adamant on advocating for the value they create within the ecosystem and feel competitors are meeting their demands. However, could more rivals to OpenSea sway users by claiming to value and reward their participation? And could others potentially exploit users who blindly follow these notions and protocols?SOS: OpenDao receives mixed reviewsSince launching, SOS has locked in 13.7 trillion SOS in staking ($45.6 million) and 50% of its total 100 trillion total total supply is distributed to the community. Up until January 12, 2022 users were eligible to claim a 145% APY for its veSOS governance token and this came equipped with voting rights for future projects and protocols. SOS appeared to have lit the match for community activism but it faced backlash after taking back its original plans to end claiming until June 30, 2022.  Many voiced their frustration and confusion, learning that in DAOs, decisions can change with the call of a vote, and participation is highly recommended.SOS Staking Pool. Source: SOS Queries Dune AnalyticsCurrently there are over 200,000 holders and more than $2.5 billion traded and future project launches plus the current NFT marketplace could see more liquidity rotating into SOS.SOS has decreased nearly 70.5% and is trading at $0.00000327despite a looming marketplace that is speculated to offer unique trading opportunities for NFTs.SOS/USD live 24-hr Sushiswap LP Chart. Source: CoinGecko Gecko Terminal NFTs continue to surge with what looks to be no end in sight. Since January 14, 2022 OpenSea notched trading volumes over $1.03 billion, while its latest rival, LooksRare, made over $1.79 billion ranking above the giant, according to data from DappRadar. Is there more to LooksRare than just wash trading?Launched on January 10, 2022, LooksRare aimed for OpenSea’s jugular— or rather its lack of Web3 incentives and initiatives— and gained the attention of many who were already discussing the “Death of OpenSea.”The token was a “free” drop, but it came with the price of several transaction fees, including placing an NFT up for sale, claiming the airdrop and staking (optional).Even with the costs, over 110,000 wallets claimed LOOKs, from approximately 60% of the total eligible wallets, according to data from Dune Analytics. Number of LOOKS vs wallet addresses that claimed the Airdrop. Source: Dune AnalyticsLooksRare has amassed nearly $2.4 billion in total volume, but the metric only shows a piece of the entire pie. A few red flags were raised when a closer look at the amount of transactions was viewed. Comparing the number of transactions on LooksRare to OpenSea reveals that OpenSea processed over 50 times the amount of transactions of LooksRare.LooksRare has an estimate of 17 times the amount of users, yet OpenSea’s volume is half that of its rival.Shortly after launch, investors grew suspicious that traders were wash trading with Larva Labs Meebits collection to take advantage of trading rewards.LooksRare vs. OpenSea Daily Users Source. Dune AnalyticsWhile there’s a camp of individuals who are championing LooksRare and find its model promising, others are raising questions and concerns about the platform’s sustainability.Fees.wtf lived up to its nameMany were fortunate to benefit from the SOS and LOOKs airdrop but the Fees.wft airdrop was a different story. Initially, the project was a fee service on the Ethereum blockchain that calculates the total gas fees a user has spent. A user had to spend at least 0.05 Ether to be eligible to claim and once announced, traders rushed to cash in only to find the initial liquidity pool was too small resulting in 58 Ether, ($188,036) being drained by a bot. 1/ $WTF: A service, a token, and what everyone said five minutes into the launch when one bot drained 58 ETH from the pool.Let’s take a look at what happened.— meows.eth (@cat5749) January 14, 2022Aptly named, it seems users did not have to mint the Fees.WTF NFT to feel rekt. Users who were not familiar with slippage tolerances found that their orders were executed for significantly less than expected, leaving one user trading over $135,000. Daily WTF holders. Source: Dune Analytics @MilkmanDespite falling nearly 84% since a spike after its initial launch, WTF seems to continue to grab the attention of new holders with its claims window still open and the number of holders increasing.Daily WTF price. Source: Dune AnalyticsProgramming the contract so that the team makes 4% after every transfer, the team has allegedly made over $3 million and counting. Even though the platform “intended” to reward users for the fees they have spent, Fee.WTF stunted on users who paid more in fees than they actually claimed.According to Rokitapp founder Lefteris Karapetsas, the smart contract was coded to siphon Ether from anyone who interacted with the contract. Upon further inspection, Karapetsas saw the contract encoded a fixed whitelist of those who did not need to pay transfer fees. Oh hey look the @feeswtf team posted a post-mortem: https://t.co/8v1Ng3DupHIf that does not tell you need to know about the “project” I don’t know what will.— Lefteris Karapetsas | Hiring for @rotkiapp (@LefterisJP) January 15, 2022

Despite suspected wash trading and the contentious issues surrounding the association to Cole, Pudgy Penguin co-creator and investor in the project, LooksRare provides a competitive edge to OpenSea because it falls in line with the current demand of Web3 users. OpenDAO and LooksRare are good examples of what OpenSea competitors possess and are waiting to unleash. With the increasing number of individuals entering the crypto ecosystem, and many advocating for Web3 incentives, traders need to take heed and evaluate where they are placing their attention and value since there are platforms that are laser-focused on exploiting their needs.The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Čítaj viac

5 NFT marketplaces that could topple OpenSea in 2022

OpenSea has been the dominant decentralized platform for users looking to mint, buy, sell and trade nonfungible tokens (NFTs). Serving more as an NFT aggregator than a gallery, OpenSea locked in $3.25 billion in volume for December 2021 alone, according to data from Dune Analytics and from December 2020 to December 2021, the total volume increased by a whopping 90,968%.No stranger to contention and criticism, OpenSea has had its fair share of perils and pitfalls. Most notably, its former head of product, Nate Chastain, found using insider information to front-run and profit from selling the platform’s front page NFTs. Adding to the overall feeling of distrust, the community felt devalued after newly appointed chief financial officer (CFO) Brian Roberts hinted at going public. However, he quickly reaffirmed that OpenSea has no intention to go public anytime soon.OpenSea might be the top NFT marketplace by transaction volumes at the moment, but in 2022, there are bound to be a handful of competitors aiming to unseat the giant.Here are five NFT marketplaces that could potentially shake the top contender from its spot in the coming months ahead. Coinbase NFTCoinbase seems to be leaning on elements of centralization as the primary driver for mass adoption. Tapping into the growing popularity of NFTs, Coinbase rivals OpenSea in launching its NFT marketplace, Coinbase NFT. According to reports, the waitlist has exceeded 1.1 million, which is more than OpenSea’s total active user-base alone. Monthly active traders at OpenSea. Source: Dune AnalyticsAnnouncing its launch of Coinbase NFT was a signal that captured the increasing value NFTs could capture as digital collectibles continue to go mainstream. Understanding how NFTs bridge culture and commerce, Coinbase NFT is likely to shake up the order of things. Meanwhile, the project has established partnerships with collections like World of Women, DeadFellaz and Lazy Lions. While the marketplace has not yet launched, its waitlist alone suggests that many investors are either eager to gain exposure to the technology for the first time or want alternatives to what they already use.It gives us great pride to announce our partnership with the Kings and Queens of the Lions Den. We love us some @LazyLionsNFT. #ROAR pic.twitter.com/5Od1d77dPm— Coinbase NFT (@Coinbase_NFT) December 7, 2021Based on a statement made by Coinbase, Coinbase NFT will be peer-to-peer (P2P) “…with an intuitive design built on top of a decentralized marketplace.” Initially following the ERC-21 and ERC-1155 standards, the product also has plans to support multi-chains in the future. Coinbase NFT will primarily function as a marketplace, but the company has hinted that it will also serve as a place to “foster connections.” To date, Coinbase operates in over 100 countries and reports over 73 million active users while Coinbase’s clients quarterly trade $327 billion in volume, proving that there is a decent amount of liquidity in circulation.More than the amount of volume trading, Coinbase touts its robust user experience (UX) and seamless user interface (UI) design that is streamlined and user-friendly. Even though many take to Twitter and complain about OpenSea’s UX/UI design, many other platforms come with barriers to entry, whereas OpenSea doesn’t. FTX NFTs Contrary to Coinbase NFT, FTX marketplace launched in October with a small collection of Solana-based NFTs, and it expanded its collection toward those on the Ethereum blockchain. Unlike OpenSea and Coinbase NFT, FTX NFTs is not a P2P platform, meaning it is centralized and custodial, whereby users’ data is recorded and stored on its particular network. This means users and collectors forgo ownership in some sense. The implications of it being a centralized platform are that the platform tends to enforce less autonomous perks to its owners and more restrictions and limitations due to securities laws concerns. Unlike OpenSea where users have full autonomy over their digital assets up until the sale, FTX NFTs implements bidding mechanisms. ​​As Brett Harrison, President FTX.US explained in a statement: “By not requiring gas for doing things like bids, we’re going to see a lot more price action and price discovery on the platform, and we hope that in general attracts liquidity,” Its law-abiding ways caused such a strong influence across the Solana NFT collections that many had to revoke their formerly promised royalties since FTX NFTs announced it no longer would support projects granting its owners such a perk. The consequence came as a result of United States regulatory concerns. Projects on the Ethereum network are also vetted to make sure they are abiding by securities laws and to ensure they are not counterfeit knockoffs. As such, OpenSea retains its value as it maintains quite the breadth of NFT collections. Solana nft devsLast week: “We need to add royalties to our project”This week: “No royalties. We need to be on FTX”.— Ayofinance (@Ayofinance1) October 11, 2021

Regardless of its minor hiccups, the marketplace has received attention and undercuts its rival in fee structure. FTX NFTs has a fee structure of 2%, while Coinbase’s is 2.5%. The platform also doesn’t seem to be dismissive to users eventually using non-custodial wallets, but its primary focus is value in accessibility. Rarible Long before OpenSea pumped its way to the top, Rarible was putting up monthly trading volumes higher than its counterpart. Despite opening its platform to the community with its governance token RARI — something OpenSea users have persistently been anticipating — Rarible has not been able to sustain the lead it once had over OpenSea. In November, the platform’s total value in volume was 4% higher than in October, averaging an estimated $18.2 million. However, its monthly total volume pales in comparison to OpenSea’s, given its daily volume averages at least five times higher.To Rarible’s benefit, much like FTX NFTs marketplace, it understands the benefit of multi-chain strategic partnering. Rarible has already launched its support of NFTs on the Flow and Tezos blockchain, and there are plans to support Solana and Polygon in the near future. Monthly volume (primary vs secondary) sales. Source: Dune AnalyticsWith its decentralized ethos and its multi-chain support of NFTs, Rarible could become a serious contender in 2022.Zora Zora presents itself as a champion for Web 3.0 and decentralization as it touts its completely “on-chain” permissionless platform. Since decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) tend to gravitate toward these principles, the platform holds its value in historical purchases like PleasrDAOs $4 million purchase of the original doge-meme NFT. web3 means satisfying ≥1 of these criteria:- majority owned/controlled by users- permissionlessly accessible/forkable- censorship resistant@rainbowdotme is open source – > web3Coinbase wallet is closed – > not web3@ourZORA open NFT auction standards – > web3OpenSea? nope— . ∴ (@nir_III) December 15, 2021

Zora has a zero-fee structure and centers most of its efforts on being the cornerstone permissionless protocol. Many crypto pundits are attracted to the idea of artists and creators having more autonomy and ownership over their creations. If these remain pertinent concerns in 2022, it’s possible that Zora could see an influx of new users.Magic Eden Magic Eden is currently the top NFT marketplace on the Solana network and according to DappRadar it is ranked among the top ten NFT marketplaces with $267.14 million since its launch in mid-September 2021. The number of unique wallets has rebounded and has been steadily increasing in the last two months making it a strong contender to OpenSea. Although it’s important to note that users are known to hold more than one wallet address, perhaps suggesting that there could be fewer unique active users.OpenSea on-chain data. Source: DappRadarLow transaction fees at 2% give the platform a competitive edge when compared to other marketplaces and, like FTX NFTs, listing is free for users. As shown below, the number of transactions on Magic Eden often doubles or even triples the amount of transactions occurring on OpenSea.Magic Eden on-chain data. Source: DappRadarAlthough Magic Eden had a higher amount of transactions, the amount per transaction is less than on OpenSea. According to DappRadar, Magic Eden has amassed over 4.5 million transactions within the last 30 days while OpenSea has processed less than half that figure at 1.7 million, yet it has a little over five times the total volume of Magic Eden. As the pace of NFTs has been set and digital collectibles continue to go mainstream, 2022 could see a larger demographic whose preferences may not align with OpenSea. By valuing accessibility, regulation and a better user experiences, these five NFT marketplaces are strong contenders to take their spot on top. The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Čítaj viac

5 NFT-based blockchain games that could soar in 2022

After the popularity of DeFi, came the rise of nonfungible tokens (NFTs) and to the surprise of many, NFTs took the spotlight and remain front and center with the highest volume in sales, occuring at the start of January 2022. Growing number of unique NFT buyers on Ethereum Source: Delphi DigitalWhile 2021 became the year of NFTs, GameFi applications did surpass DeFi in terms of user popularity. According to data from DappRadar, Bloomberg gathered: “Nearly 50% of active cryptocurrency wallets connected to decentralized applications in November were for playing games. The percentage of wallets linked to decentralized finance, or DeFi, dapps fell to 45% during the same period, after months of being the leading dapp use case.” Blockchain, play-to-earn game Axie infinity, skyrocketed and kicked off a gaming craze that is expected to continue all throughout 2022. Crypto pundits and gaming advocates have high expectations for p2e blockchain-based games and there’s bound to be a few sleeping giants that will dominate the sector.Let’s take a look at five blockchain games that could make waves in 2022.DeFi KingdomsThe inspiration for DeFi Kingdoms came from simple beginnings— a passion for investing that lured the developers to blockchain technology. DeFi Kingdoms was born as a visualization of liquidity pool investing where in-game ‘gardens’ represent literal and figurative token pairings and liquidity pool mining. As shown in the game, investors have a portion of their LP share within a plot filled with blooming plants. By attaching the concept of growth to DeFi protocols within a play-and-earn model, DeFi Kingdoms puts a twist on “playing” a game.DeFi Kingdoms aerial image. Source: Twitter DeFi KingdomsBuilt on the Harmony Network, DeFi Kingdoms became the first project on the network to ever top the DappRadar charts. This could be attributed to an influx of individuals interested in both DeFi and blockchain games or it could be attributed to its recent in-game, utility token (JEWEL) surging.JEWEL is a utility token which allows users to purchase NFTs in-game buffs to increase base-level stat, and it is used for liquidity mining that grants users the opportunity to make more JEWEL through staking. JEWEL/USD daily chart. Source: Gecko Terminal JEWEL is also a governance token that gives holders a vote in the growth and evolution of the project. In the past four months the token price surged from $1.23 to an all time high of $22.52. At the time of writing JEWEL is down by nearly 16%, trading at $19.51. Surging approximately 1,487% from its humble start of $1.23 four months ago, back in September, JEWEL token price has increased roughly 165% this last month alone, according to data from CoinGecko. Guild of GuardiansGuild of Guardians is one of the more anticipated blockchain games in 2022 and it is built on ImmutableX, the first layer-2 solution built on Ethereum that focuses on NFTs. Aiming to provide more access, it will operate as a free to play, mobile RPG game modeling the play-and-earn mechanics. Guild of Guardians Heroes. Source: Guild of GuardiansSimilar to blockchain games like Axie Infinity, Guild of Guardians in-game assets can be exchanged. The project seems to be of interest to many gamers and investors with both its NFT founder sale and token launch generating nearly $10 million in volume. Launching its in-game token in October of 2021, the Guild of Guardians (GOG) tokens are ERC-20 tokens known as ‘gems’ inside the game. Gems are what power key features in the game such as mint in-game NFTs, interact with the marketplace and are available to earn while playing. GOG monthly price action. Source: CoinGeckoFor the last month, the Guild of Guardians token has performed strongly, reaching an all-time of $2.81. Despite the token being down nearly 50% from it’s all-time high, at the time of writing, some members of the community are looking forward to the possibility of staking and liquidity pools, which are features that tend to help stabilize token prices.Galaxy Fight ClubImagine taking a proof-of-picture (pfp) NFT and making it into an avatar to battle other fighters in a galaxy far away? Galaxy Fight Club (GFC) is a blockchain game that switched its gear from a 10,000 avatar collection to the first cross-brand and cross-platform PvP fighting game where players can fight with their collection of avatars.Focusing on interoperability, GFC uniquely places high value on its original fighters, but allows other avatars to battle for the opportunity to earn rewards.Artist’s depiction of gameplay in GFC. Source: Galaxy Fight Club AvatarThe game is expected to launch on the Polygon network and it will feature different themes from various partnering collections such as Animetas and CyberKongz, integrating its cross–platform aim. GFC plays on the nostalgia of SuperSmash Bros., except one is battling for loot keys to open loot boxes rather than simply wiping out their opponent.GFC is currently in beta testing, and is facing minor setbacks, including a delayed IDO. To date, it’s not clear when public access will be made available, but many are hopeful for a Q1 2022 rollout. GCOINEach Galaxy Fighter generates anywhere between 5 to 15 GCOIN daily, and each fighter began generating GCOIN in October of 2021. If a fighter is sold, the new owner will inherit the GCOIN presently accrued. GCOIN is likely to be valuable in the ecosystem because it is needed to power players in game moves, the forging of weapons, opening loot boxes and training and selling second generation fighters.Despite its minor setbacks, an IDO for GCOIN is scheduled on PolkaStarter for January 6and is set to release 4 million tokens for sale at $0.50 each and a max allocation of $500 per wallet. Sadly, the project’s KYC and whitelist requirements have left many residents sitting out.According to Ado, a team lead for the project, “The first $1.5M was purchased and sold out in roughly 15 minutes, at which point the remaining $500K reserved only for the Battle Pass holders took another hour to be filled,” indicating a successful IDO. Approximately 2,600 unique wallets are holding GFC fighters, with the top wallet holding nearly 2% of the entire collection. CryptoBeastsCryptoBeasts is a pixelated digital art game that elicits the retro feel of the original Zelda game. Built on the Ethereum blockchain CryptoBeasts is a ‘peer-to-peer electronic rare egg system,’ (first for everything, right?) These 10,000 pixelated colorful eggs grant each owner one land parcel in the game’s “Eggland” universe and one DAO vote. Hatched CryptoBeasts. Source: CryptoBeastsThe DAO operates on a hierarchy where the number of eggs a player owns determines their status and as strange as it sounds, each decision appears to be calculated in CryptoBeasts. Numbers are worth noting as they can determine one’s status, and prime numbered eggs tout benefits like yielding more of its native CBX token and they also hatch rare beasts with increased strength.According to data from Dune Analytics, the highest-selling rare egg went for 5 Ether, valued at $9,085 at the time of sale. On December 31, 2021 an announcement about in-game tokenomics resulted in an uptick in sales and the current entry point at 0.05 Ether is notably higher than the 0.01 ETH mint price in June 2021. CBX tokenWhile Cryptobeasts claims it’s more than “play to earn,” but rather “fun-to-play” it is still a blockchain game whose competitive edge is also dependent on its tokenomics. The native token, CBX, is the in-game token that is scheduled to be airdropped to all rare-egg holders. CBX tokens can allegedly be used and earned in a variety of ways such as beast battling, land parcels generating daily CBX, completing certain in-game tasks and farming and harvesting resources. CBX can also be staked, incentivizing HODLing a little longer than intended. The token is expected to power in-game utilities and functionalities like purchasing items within the in-game economy to breeding. Similar to Axie Infinity, but not by happenstance, CryptoBeasts intends to integrate an academy and scholarship to provide the opportunity for bigger investors to loan out their assets.Axie Infinity Notably, the first blockchain game to execute its play-to-earn model, Axie Infinity has an established, highly developed ecosystem with a strong economic model. Axie Infinity is currently seen as the trojan horse for broader blockchain game adoption.3D scene of Axies. Source: Axie Infinity Land 3D TeaserAxie Infinity continues to solidify its place at the top of DappRadar NFT rankings, according to its data. As the top traded collection, Axie Infinity comes on top of NBA TopShot, Splinterlands, and WAX blockchain’s, “Farmer’s World,” closing out $563.6 million in the past 30 days. SLP, AXS and RONAxies are the NFT used for gameplay and can be bred using SLP, the in-game utility token, and AXS, which is the governance token. AXS can be staked, and with over $1.68 billion staked, users are continuing to reap a substantial APY despite yield being reduced from over 200% at the start to roughly 86%. The recent launch of the Katana DEX gives players the opportunity to provide liquidity using SLP or AXS to farm RON. RON is the ecosystem token and, similar to MATIC, it will be used as the gas fees on Axie Infinity’s Ronin sidechain. Axie Infinity, in many ways, is its own digital nation with a real economy. Like any first market mover, it faces challenges and its recent price correction could be an attractive entry point for investors who were previously priced out. With land yet to be released, users may have the opportunity to craft and harvest resources that will generate other tokens. To date, one of the largest digital land sales in the NFT / Metaverse sector came from an Axie Infinity one of 75 genesis land plots that sold for $2.3 million.Adapting to the rapidly growing blockchain games ecosystem, the Sky Mavis team has announced that it has rewritten the core engine from its 2D art style to 3D. The team also announced that ‘Project K’— codename for a piece of a game and Lunacia’s kingdom— will be released in phases and each focuses on different elements of the game from resource gathering to “group strategic gameplay.” As the concept of blockchain games gains broader adoption, and “play to earn” and “play and earn” models continue to develop, 2022 will be an exciting year for gamers, creators, and investors alike. The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Čítaj viac

A tale of two NFTs: Could Bored Ape Yacht Club flip CryptoPunks?

Rising from its modest minting price of 0.08 Ether (ETH), Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) has climbed to nonfungible-token (NFT) stardom, competing with one of the earliest examples of Larva Labs CryptoPunk NFT. Given its steady but amplified growth, BAYC has many crypto natives speculating that its collection will eventually “flip” CryptoPunks, and there are several reasons to back it. Tip-toeing around which collection is the top NFT contender, the competition between these two collections is driven by several factors. With an existing divide between mainstream media adoption and the IP rights granted to its owners, the BAYC and CryptoPunks collection also have a disparate amount of unique holders. This is important because the amount of unique holders is often indicative of a wider spread of owners, meaning it’s less at the mercy of a single sale dictating the projects overall or floor value. Let’s take a look at some of the factors NFT advocates and traders are talking about in regards to the BAYC project flipping the floor price of CryptoPunks.  Two different labs and visionsThe stagnation of CryptoPunks in comparison to the dynamic marketing nature of BAYC leaves many speculating that a “flippening” is inevitable. To add fuel to fire, although there are many copyright options given to creators, the “no rights reserved” option is not one given at LarvaLabs. As such, many have taken to Twitter to comment in support of the speculation. One particular now-former CryptoPunk #4156 was sold for 2,500 Ether on principle and contention regarding Larva Labs’ stance on Creative Commons 0 (CC0) — otherwise known as “no rights reserved.” it’s not entitlement, it’s activism. happens all the time in public markets. large stakeholder believes they can unlock additional value, tries to plea their case. if it doesn’t work out (as seems to be the case here) they sell and move on https://t.co/dZBErq07A4— 4156 (@punk4156) December 5, 2021Beyond issues with intellectual property (IP) rights, it appears that groups of individuals are rallying around the “flippening” because BAYC has seemed to have mastered its overall marketing and strategic partnerships.Launched April 20, 2021, the funny, but bored-appearing Apes were minted for 0.08 ETH, valued at $300 at the time. Not long after more notable names like NBA star Stephen Curry began switching their Twitter profile pictures to Apes did the market begin to surge, solidifying the collection as an apparent “blue chip.”Gaining the attention and adoption of mainstream media and celebrities alike, BAYC seems to have a different trajectory than CryptoPunks. More than individuals, BAYC is strategically partnering with other brands like Adidas and, most recently, announced its partnership with Animoca Brands, a Hong-Kong based software company focused on blockchain games for its future play-to-earn (P2E) games. In confirming its partnership with Adidas, BAYC alludes to its potential interoperability — the ability to exchange data in different systems or, in this case, Metaverses. Today we leap Into The Metaverse with @BoredApeYC, @gmoneyNFT & @punkscomic.It’s time to enter a world of limitless possibilities.https://t.co/LmgtrRn20c pic.twitter.com/40kU8tayrS— adidas Originals (@adidasoriginals) December 2, 2021

CryptoPunks were first generated for free on June 23, 2017, for anyone with an Ethereum wallet. The only fee was the price of gas to mint. Although at the time, many considered CryptoPunks to be the first “NFT,” the token itself is not an ERC-721 token. While built on the Ethereum blockchain, it turns out that the CryptoPunk pre-dates the ERC-721 standard and is closer to being an ERC-20 token. According to Larva Labs, it no longer has any control over the code utilized to buy, sell and trade the CryptoPunks over the blockchain. By surrendering over its control, it gave the code more credibility through transparency, assuming that it would provide all it was promised to do. Whether that is what the community anticipated is a different story. Creators control the IP or bustThere seems to be a climate shift regarding where value is placed in an NFT collection. The ongoing contention within the NFT sphere is who owns the rights: the creator or the owner? Many are questioning projects who are granting their owners limited rights. However, very few NFT projects align themselves with a CC0 mentality where “no rights are reserved.” The few NFT projects operating in this way are CrypToadz and NounsDAO — a project dear to @punk4156. it’s not about copyright vs no copyright, it’s about making the pixels as censorship resistant as the token they’re attached to. if you don’t assign the token and the image the same rights, what’s the point of binding them together eternally on a blockchain?— 4156 (@punk4156) December 5, 2021

Not satisfied or content with the limited rights granted to CryptoPunks owners caused renowned CryptoPunks Ape Punk #4156 to change their tune. Despite the rather embedded relationship to CryptoPunks — particularly the one behind their “brand” Punks #4156, placed one of the rarest types in the collection for sale. Their Ape punk up was listed for sale at 2,500 ETH, valued at $10.26 million. As the third-highest valued CryptoPunks sold, many have taken to Twitter to comment on this historical sale. Copyright issues are what drove one of the leading community members out, and given its reputation, many are turning their eye toward the left-facing CryptoPhunks. Phunks supporters claim to align themselves on the “right side of history” since they allegedly give its owners IP rights.Despite the rights declared and given, there is something to be said about figures — there is no denying the numbers the BAYC collection has pulled. Power in numbersFor the last 30 days, the BAYC collection has amassed a trading volume of nearly 44 Ether, according to data from OpenSea. Impressively, in November alone, the floor price of BAYC surged over 50% and the average price is roughly 56.5 Ether, suggesting its floor could easily inch closer to that of Punks. 7 day Bored Ape Yacht Club floor price. Source: OpenSeaComparatively, the Crypto Punks collection’s locked in 32,005 Ethe in the last four weeks. Since the sale of Punk #4156, its floor price has steadily been decreasing and is down 7% from last month, according to data from Dune Analytics.BAYC versus CryptoPunk price performance. Source: Delphi DigitalWith so much emphasis on floor prices, the number of unique holders in an NFT collection often gets overlooked. Placing laser focus on the amount of liquidity being exchanged, one loses sight of the number of different individuals who hold the token. One could argue that the higher the number of unique holders, the more indicative the collection is to be successful. This is because it’s widely adopted and is less at the mercy of a small group of individuals who could easily set the gas to fire with a single sale.When comparing the two collections, BAYC has nearly 6,000 unique holders, whereas CryptoPunks has less than half the number of unique holders at 3,273. According to Larva Labs, the top 10 CryptoPunk owners have over 100 CryptoPunks in their wallets with the top wallet holding 410. List of top 10 CryptoPunks owners. Source: LarvaLabsAccording to Dune Analytics, the top percentage of Apes owned is 1.05%, meaning that no wallet owns more than 105 Apes. Since fewer wallets in the BAYC collection take up a large percentage of ownership, it means that there’s a larger number of individuals in the community who not only won a majority of the collection, but share a sense of collective value. The Bored Ape Yacht Club community members that will protect the value the brand has seemed to capture through its partnerships and are “diamond handing.” Percentage of Apes owned by top 50 holders. Source: Dune Analytics A potential “flippening” — but does it matter?Great emphasis is placed on “will/when BAYC flip CryptoPunks?” Perhaps the bigger question is, does it matter? Regardless of Apes flipping Punks, many argue that Apes would never outprice premium tier punks like Aliens or the CryptoPunk version of Apes. Some say that the BAYC collection lacks a range of visual “stratification of status,” making them harder to value. Only time will tell whether Apes flip Punks. However, the narrative could shift and focus less on the market caps and floor prices of both collections and more so on the value both collections capture over time, regardless of copyright limitations. After all, there is always another potential “blue chip” on the horizon. The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Čítaj viac

Získaj BONUS 8 € v Bitcoinoch

nakup bitcoin z karty

Registrácia Binance

Burza Binance

Aktuálne kurzy